Tuesday, February 09, 2010

Congo and Corruption

Removing an Eruption of Corruption



By John Taylor; 2010 Feb 09, Mulk 03, 166 BE



This past Sunday I read Nicholas Kristof's article in the New York Times about the dire situation in Congo and was sickened to my stomach by the example he cites, the repeated rapes of a young girl by roving bands of thugs. He points out that the death count in that sanguinary conflict dwarfs the earthquake in Haiti and recently surpassed the number of lives lost in the Holocaust, albeit over a ten year period. As he says, everybody who uses a computer or a cell phone is implicated in this slaughter and profits from it, since the lack of a government in Congo permits outlaws and organized criminals to rape the country for cheap raw materials. Rwanda, itself a victim of a holocaust ten years ago, has made itself into the main bad guy here, but there are bigger baddies in the background, including you and me. Rwanda for years has been exporting irregular troops inured to anarchic violence into neighbouring parts of Congo. They hide in the jungle and periodically emerge to commit torture, rape and a long list of the most horrible atrocities imaginable on hapless villagers.


How could such injustice be allowed to take place at all, much less for so long?


I am no expert in international relations, but it seems to me that it would be simple to end these situations -- I am also thinking of Somalia and, ten years ago, Serbia -- where a central government slides into oblivion and its land and people become fodder for organized criminals and bloodthirsty warlords. All you do is declare the place a UN protectorate and force democracy, order and good government upon the whole region. I would include aggressive neighbours in this, such as Rwanda for Congo, and Ethiopia for Somalia, and keep the whole region under strict tutelage by the world government for a fixed period of not less than thirty years.


This extended time would allow a new generation of young people to grow up in stable conditions where they are guaranteed useful employment. It is well known that once young men are raised and trained to fight as irregulars, the cycle of violence catches on and it is all but impossible to extirpate the ways of war and rapine. Meanwhile, powerful parties find the corruption profitable, and then it gets even harder to get rid of corruption's sinkhole. This happened in the Balkans, Sri Lanka, Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan and reportedly is getting underway in Yemen.


However, I cannot deny that an externally imposed pacification is like smearing makeup over an open sore. The real infection, the underlying disease is invisible. The real problem is corruption, not only political but educational and spiritual.


So the question remains, how do you get rid of corruption?


Again, we know the answer. In the same way a doctor cures a disease, by applying a combination of a range of remedies, starting with the latest in disinfectants and antibiotics. There are many specific, effective remedies to political corruption, but they depend upon changes in education and religion as well. You cannot succeed in treating the body without improving the mind and heart. Unless all three cures are applied immediately and energetically, the international order will remain a tragic joke.


Politically, the first corruption is a sort of leprosy attacking democracy. Somehow we must clean up the democratic process, the party system, the oppositional mindset that sets person against person, group against group. This dissipates the massive power released by the great virtue of democracy, gaining the consent of the people for those who rule. As long as leaders must bribe the people, and the wealthy bribe them, and they depend on vested interests to keep their jobs, and the people balk at authority, how can national governments seriously block criminal activity on their level, far less the world level? That is why I devote a good third of the book I am writing, People Without Borders, to ideas on how to improve liberal democracy by eliminating partisan rivalry.


One rather surprising cure to corruption was suggested by Abdu'l-Baha in Secret of Divine Civilization: pay equity. If everybody, especially police and government officials, gets a fair, even a generous wage, there will be no excuse for anybody to be seeking profit under the table. There should be a leader and follower's constitution and bill of rights, one that applies everywhere, including the military (definition of military: a dictatorship within a democracy). In my opinion, we should interpret the master's suggestion of fair pay very broadly, to the whole workplace. Not only wealth but rights should be given generously.


There should be a worker and employer's constitution and bill of rights to which everyone can appeal. Rather than artificially separating owners from managers from workers, as the rules of corporations now do, cooperative arrangements should unite them. There must also be rule of law in all ownership. The first owner of every world resource has to be the entire human race; if all people do not own the controlling number of shares, the resource will be subject to corruption and should be marked for reform.


Another good suggestion I heard lately in a TED India talk is a 911 number that you can call whenever an instance of corrupt practice threatens to takes place. If the authorities responded instantly whenever, say, an official hints that he wants a bribe to do his job, corruption would be far more difficult. Just as we send firefighters to put out fires as soon as humanly possible, we should send corruption fighters rushing to extinguish the contagion before crime, war and hatred start a wildfire beyond control. This is, quite literally, God's fight, according to the Qur'an,



"Whenever they light a fire for war, God puts it out; they strive for corruption in the earth, but God loves not the corrupt." (Qur'an 5, tr. E.H. Palmer)



Of course, none of this would work without widespread publicity and a systematic educational campaign. I have always thought that every time anybody is arrested, no matter what the reason, no matter if they are guilty or innocent, they should be subjected to a barrage of lectures, admonitions, propaganda, discussion, every argument possible so that, no matter what their opinions, they will come out at least thinking about the fight against corruption, and aware of what they might do to help. It is crazy to brutalize prisoners and, by harsh conditions, give them the message that punishment, rather than love and knowledge, is the answer.



"If the Truth had been in accord with their desires, truly the heavens and the earth, and all beings therein would have been in confusion and corruption! Nay, We have sent them their admonition, but they turn away from their admonition." (The Qur'an 23:71, Yusuf Ali, tr.)



Finally, we must get every religious group involved in the fight against corruption. Everyone who calls the corruption 911 number, everyone who is charged with a crime, needs to have the option of hearing an argument against corruption from one of their own faith's religious leaders. This is part of the progress to a common faith for all human beings. Baha'u'llah Himself prescribed this cure.



"In this glorious Day whatever will purge you from corruption and will lead you towards peace and composure, is indeed the Straight Path." (Baha'u'llah, Tablets, 171)


"The purging of such deeply-rooted and overwhelming corruptions cannot be effected unless the peoples of the world unite in pursuit of one common aim and embrace one universal faith. Incline your ears unto the Call of this Wronged One and adhere firmly to the Lesser Peace." (Baha'u'llah, Tablets, 69)



::


Sunday, February 07, 2010

Byng Conservation Area



Silvie, Thomas and Amber the Sheltie, with me walking ahead, last weekend in Byng Conservation Area, across the Grand River from where we live.

Saturday, February 06, 2010

Divine Tack

Getting Tacked


It has been many months since I had a full blown migraine attack. So long in fact that I lost the fear. Usually I juggle several measures to stave off the onset of an attack -- including increasing my intake of water -- but on Tuesday a migraine crept up on me as we were busy moving junk out of the attic. I missed some of the early signs migraine and did not notice until I was losing vision.


 This blindness is hard to describe, but it is like your normal blind spot, which you never notice, had expanded to the size of a penny laid on your eye. Before, I would have panicked and tried last ditch measures (lying in bed in a darkened room, hot bath, drinking water until I burst) but this time I had to go to the library to take back some DVD's, so, without fear, I walked there, experiencing all the while a grand mal seizure. First, on the way to the library, I lost all sensation in my right arm. Then, while in the building, my tongue went numb. It was as if the blind spot in my vision had grown to take in my tongue. I felt like Jarjar Binks in the Star Wars film, my tongue hanging out, limp and useless. Then I walked home and the numbness moved most of the way down my left arm, leaving the hand unfelt.


 It has taken days to recover from that attack, and I understand why I was so afraid and so willing to do just about anything to avoid such an attack. This is nothing to take lightly. But this time I worked on my fear, for fear can be a contributing factor as well. Now I visualize the experience like this: it is as if God had tacked me to His bulletin board for a few hours. The tack stuck me in the eyes, went over to my right arm, to the tongue and left off on my left. The numbness was a brainstorm taking place deep in the brain, but the point of the tack was felt, or rather not felt, outwardly. Why does the image of God's bulletin board impress itself on me now? I think because, gruelling as it was, it felt somehow sacred. What greater honour than to be a note tacked up to remind the Creator of something He had to do?


Not long after the attack I happened to listen to a podcast of a speech Rabbi Kushner gave in Toronto last fall about his new book about fear. It was just what I needed to hear at that time. I was so impressed with his words of wisdom I played it for the kids last night for their daily Baha'i class. He has just the right mix of humour and sageness to make his speech appeal to the kids. We desperately need Baha'i speakers who can do that! The only Baha'i speaker around here that I know of (he has his own self-deprecating humour that is different but just as effective in his own way as Kushner) is Gordon Naylor.

It has been several days but I still am weakened by this grueling experience. I hope to get back to writing soon.


::


Thursday, February 04, 2010

Early Years

Autobiography of Richard St. Barbe Baker

Part II


This is part II of the first chapter of the autobiography of Baha'i environmentalist Richard St. Barbe Baker (1889-1982), called "My Life, My Trees." The first part of this series is in the Badi' Blog entry for Jan 12, 2010, at:

http://badiblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/bakers-early-years.html



Baker's Early Years

Chapter One: I Am Led Forth (part II)


My father could not abide sectarianism and each month held a United prayer-meeting to which he welcomed ministers of all denominations. In the atmosphere of prayer their religious differences vanished, for with their convenor they all acknowledged the Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Man. To his hospitable home came Hindus and Buddhists, Persian Sufis, devout followers of Islam and missionaries on furlough.

In the high summer of 1894 I had an unforgettable experience which at the early age of five altered my outlook on life and I believe more than anything influenced the way by which I have come.

As I have already explained, my earliest and happiest memories are bound up with trees. One of the earliest is that of the pine forest which came up close to the house. I often sat in the sun there and in the tree tops I seemed to hear the sound of waves breaking on the sea-shore. Those pines spoke to me of distant lands and gave me my first desire to travel and see the trees of other countries. At times I would imagine that these tall pines were talking to each other as they shook or nodded their heads at the whim of the winds. I did not know then that I would be at school with James Elroy Flecker who once wrote:

"For pines are gossip pines the wide world through."

My old nurse, Perrin, was a real native of Hampshire. As a girl she used to glean in the fields and get sufficient wheat, she told me, to keep them in bread for the year. She was married to a forester in charge of woodlands belonging to Queen's College, Oxford. These woodlands adjoined my father's estate, and from my earliest days my nurse took me for walks there. I loved the Perrin cottage; it was on a knoll on the fringe of the woods and from it I could peer into the dark woods of "dreamy gloomy friendly trees". That pine forest was full of romance and boyish adventure for me.

A stone's throw from the cottage was a large brick oven, where the weekly batch of bread was baked. I often watched spellbound to see the hot, sweet-smelling loaves removed from the oven. To me Perrin was a sort of High Priestess officiating at her altar and the scent of the burning gorse seemed like incense to me. When I was small it was the huge sandpit that provided the greatest attraction for me. It was in full sight of the oven and I usually played in it on baking days. It was there that I made my first attempt at treescaping. I collected twigs of pines broken off by squirrels or the wind and stuck them into mounds of sand. I planted an avenue leading up to a sand-castle, complete with drawbridge and moat. My early treescaping efforts were influenced to some extent by the attractive coloured slides shown by my father.

The surrounding woods were extensive and in those days I never penetrated very far, nor would Perrin take me into the forest as a rule. To a small boy their depths were mysterious and rather awe-inspiring. One day, I found I had exhausted my ideas of treescaping in the sandpit and so, greatly daring, asked if I might be allowed to go for a walk in the wood. Perrin said the woods were full of adders at this time of the year and no safe place for the likes of a small boy. But I coaxed her to let me go and reluctantly she allowed me to set out on what seemed to me a wonderful expedition. No explorer of space probing the secrets of other planets could have felt more exultation than I did at that moment.

As I set out on that greatest of all forest adventures, at first I kept to a path which wound its way down into the valley; but soon I found myself in a dense part of the forest where the trees were taller and the path became lost in bracken beneath the pines. Soon I was completely isolated in the luxuriant, tangled growth of ferns which were well above my head. In my infant mind I seemed to have entered the fairyland of my dreams. I wandered on as in a dream, all sense of time and space lost. As I continued this mysterious journey, looking up every now and then I could see shafts of light where the sunshine lit up the morning mists and made subtle shadows on the huge bracken fronds which provided a continuous canopy of bright green over me. Their pungent scent was a delight to me. Although I could see only a few yards ahead, I had no sense of being shut in. The sensation was exhilarating. I began to walk faster, buoyed up with an almost ethereal feeling of well-being, as if I had been detached from earth. I became intoxicated with the beauty around me, immersed in the joyousness and exultation of feeling part of it all.

Soon the bracken became shorter, and before long it was left behind as a clearing opened where the dry pine needles covered the floor of the forest with a soft brown carpet. Rays of light pierced the canopy of the forest, were reflected in the ground mists and appeared as glorious shafts interlaced with the tall stems of the trees; bright and dark threads woven into a design. I had entered the temple of the woods. I sank to the ground in a state of ecstasy; everything was intensely vivid -- the call of a distant cuckoo seemed just by me. I was alone and yet encompassed by all the living creatures I loved so dearly.

As I lay back a dead twig snapped, like the crack of a whip, the birds warbling sounded like the notes of a cathedral organ. The overpowering beauty of it all entered my very being. At that moment my heart brimmed over with a sense of unspeakable thankfulness which has followed me through the years since that woodland re-birth. My gratitude for this cosmic experience can be perhaps best expressed in the Scots' metrical version of the Twenty-third Psalm:


==========

Goodness and Mercy all my life, Shall surely follow me:

And in God's house for evermore, My dwelling-place shall be.

==========


I was lost in the depths of the forest, but at that moment this did not dawn upon me. I was conscious of a feeling of bliss only once repeated in my childhood.
 The second experience was when my father, in a lantern lecture on Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress, threw on the screen a picture of Beulah Land. With a hundred and fifty others I sang the hymn:


==========


O! Beulah land,
 Sweet Beulah land,
 As on the highest mount I stand
 And gaze away across the sea
 Where mansions are prepared for me,
 I view the shining-glory shore
 My heaven, my home for evermore.


==========


In the wood among the pines, it seemed that for one brief moment I had tasted immortality, and in a few seconds had lived an eternity. This experience may last for ever.

Just beyond the tall pines was another trail where I turned to the left. In a few minutes I was back with Perrin and the commonplace things of daily life -- the washing and the baking. But how everything in this short interval had changed; even the clothes hanging out to dry on the line tied between two pines seemed like gay flags hung out for a coronation. I watched red-faced old Perrin taking out the most wonderful loaves from the brick oven. Close to her side, I walked home to the midday meal as if treading on air. I no longer minded the big black dog that used to bark so furiously at us. Even Rasey, the cross old gardener, looked like a favourite uncle to me. I seemed to sense the affection of my parents as never before. I was in love with life; I was indeed born again, although I could not have explained what had happened to me then.

The next day I went back to the woods. They now held a new and strange fascination for me. Perrin gave her consent more readily but added her usual caution, "Keep out of harm's way." I used to wonder why it was that Perrin never seemed to want to go into the woods and never, never encouraged me to venture very far. With her it was always those adders, or the 'obidyois and the little folk'.

It was a bright sunny day and this time I kept to the woodland path which brought me out to some younger plantations. I tried to find the place where I had been the day before, but, though I must have been very close, it evaded me, nor did I again experience the rapture of the previous day.

After a while I used to explore different parts of the woods. I heft the pines and ventured into a beech wood. On the fringe of the beeches I could get a clear view of Winchester, twelve miles away. On good days I could see St. Catherine's Hill, where we oftentimes went for picnics near a clump of beeches.

There was a litle maze cut in the ground and I and my brother Scott used to race each other to the middle, which took about eight minutes, then out again. We were told that it had been cut by a boy at Winchester School who had been kept back at the end of term as a punishment. It was said that he had cut this huge maze with his penknife, then died of a broken heart singing Dulce domum.

That story used to make me feel sad and unhappy; I entered into his distress at being prevented from returning home for the holidays. But when I was feeling unhappy, or if things had gone wrong for me during the day, I would leave the house, run down the little lane, cross the meadow and visit a particular beech tree in the wood. That beech with smooth bark was a Mother Confessor to my Madonna of the Woods.

Standing by the friendly beech, I knew in my heart that my troubles and my grief, as well as all that pleased me, were but for a passing moment. I would imagine that I had roots digging down deep into Mother Earth and that all above I was sprouting branches. I would hold that in my thoughts for a few moments and then come back with the strength of the tree and a radiant heart, knowing that that was all that really mattered.

John Masefield's inspired Terra Incognita in Lollington Downs and Other Poems, 1917, expresses my feeling:


==========


Here in the self is all that man can know
Of Beauty, all the wonder, all the power,
All the unearthly colour, all the glow,
Here in the self which withers like a flower;
Here in the self which fades as hours pass,
And droops and dies and rots and is forgotten
Sooner, by ages, than the mirroring glass
In which it sees its glory still unrotten ...
Beauty herself, the universal mind,
Eternal April wandering alone;
The God, the Holy Ghost, the atoning Lord,
Here in the flesh, the never yet explored.

==========


From that moment life became exciting and I entered with zest into the Sunday services and helped my father at the week-night meetings. The Mission Hall on Beacon Hill opened its doors to the workless in the dark days of unemployment and became a shining spiritual beacon. Coffee suppers were served and illustrated talks on Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress listened to with rapt attention. By the age of twelve I was sometimes called upon to deputize for my father. In time, I and my brother, Scott, used to walk the five miles to Curdridge Church for the morning service and some Sundays to Bitterne, two miles in another direction, for the evening service. On my return after supper, my father would ask me to read Spurgeon's Sermons to him. Having given out all day he liked to hear a sermon from The Christian Herald or perhaps an article on prophecy from The English Churchman.

Regularly once a month the Reverend Melville Churchill, cousin of Sir Winston, and erudite contributor to The English Churchman under the name of 'M.A. Cantab', used to walk the eight miles from his home in Bishops Waltham to visit us. He was in sympathy with my father's evangelical work and he too had built a Mission Hall. He had a weakness for the perfectly made moka coffee my father had learned to make during the winters he had spent as a child in France. The books of Daniel and Revelation provided these earnest students of prophecy with dates which seemed to confirm past happenings and led them to look for future fulfilment. I was fascinated by their exciting conclusions when substituting a year for a day.

Towards the end of the Boer War when Mr. Churchill arrived for his monthly discussion, my father greeted him with,

"That young cousin of yours in South Africa is a bit of a harum scarum, isn't he?"

"You might think so, John, but Winston keeps his parents with his war stories in The Daily Telegraph. Mark my word, John, one day he will be Prime Minister of England."

Many were the famous preachers who visited my father to preach in the Mission Hall. I always remember General Booth, the Founder of the Salvation Army, discussing the progress of the soul with my father one Sunday evening after supper. The General maintained that backsliding would be forgiven twice but never a third time. To illustrate his point he knelt by a chair and, holding up his thumb and first two fingers said, "Mr. Baker, here's the soul," while I watched with intense interest, taking for granted the soul was there. He placed his thumb and fingers on the chair and brought them across to somewhere near the middle and suddenly drew them back.

"There, Mr. Baker," he said, "that's once." Again he advanced the imaginary soul to somewhere near the edge of the chair, then withdrew it, looking fiercely at my father.

"That, Mr. Baker, is the second time."

The third time he passed his fingers and thumb to the edge of the chair and brought them down to the floor with a thump. I was so hypnotized by the General and in sympathy with the poor soul I too fell flat on my face on the floor. The General continued to lay down the law, while my father pleaded with him that God was able to forgive until seventy times seven. But the General would have none of this -- he had his own rules for salvation.

It was in this atmosphere that I was brought up to wait on the guests and run errands for my father. As the eldest of a family of five I became responsible at an early age.


My first school was in the neighbouring village of Bitterne which I walked to, making a short cut through an adjoining property, until I was seven, when I had my first bicycle -- a heavy frame affair with cushion tyres. During the holidays I went for long rides throughout the New Forest and our part of the county.

One of our neighbours kept bees and one day I watched him manipulate a hive. When he took out a bar-frame covered with bees I asked him to let me hold it. I was thrilled with the sight and when I went home I asked my father if he would give me a hive. After some days, when he found that my heart was set on keeping bees, he suggested that I might exchange some of my apple trees that I had myself grafted for a stock.

This was when I was twelve. By the time I was sixteen I had become a proficient bee-master, with sixteen hives, the best of which in a single season yielded me two hundred and forty pounds of honey. I built up my apiary with driven bees which I rescued from the cottagers' sulphur pits. My modern bar-framed hives I had made in my own workshop after the model of the first one I had bought.

I am always grateful to my parents for allowing me to have my own garden at an early age and build a little house of my own and later a revolving summer house for my mother. It seemed natural for me to do these things and I would have felt frustrated if prevented. My father believed that whatever a man's profession he should still be able to keep himself and his family by manual labour. I have proved for myself the soundness of this theory, having worked my way through three universities, and been given an honorary degree at the first forestry school in the U.S.A. for my contribution in creating employment on the land for six million young men. I have always found it a distinct advantage to be able to show someone how to do a job, instead of issuing orders on paper.

There is another aspect of life on the land; while working in forest or garden a man has time for meditation and indeed his very act is devotion. He becomes in tune with the Infinite. The miracle of growth and the seasons' changes induce a sense of wonderment and call forth worship from his inner being and in this sense WORK becomes WORSHIP.

Although my father had had a tutor he decided that if at all possible I should go to a Public School and he was concerned that it should be one with Evangelical tendencies. No doubt he discussed this with the Rev. Melville Churchill; so in 1902, when I was thirteen, I was sent to Dean Close School, Cheltenham. The Headmaster was a German Jew by the name of Flecker, who had married a Russian Jewess. Both were clever. Their eldest son, James Elroy, became a poet and wrote Hassan.

My dear mother came to my first Speech Day and seemed to be spending a lot of time with Mrs. Flecker. On the first night of the holidays after she had heard me say my prayers, she said:

"My dear boy, I do hope you have nothing to do with Elroy Flecker -- his mother was unburdening her heart to me about the trouble he has been to her and his dear father." Elroy had already gone up to Oxford but he brought cricket teams to play the school. After my mother's warning I thought I would investigate for myself and become friendly with him, although he was rather a recluse.

While I was at school at Cheltenham I was fortunate enough to get to know the Elwes family at Colesbourne, about six miles away in the Cotswolds. It was a wooded estate of about seven thousand acres and there I would often spend my half-term or good conduct holidays. The owner of these extensive woodlands was writing a book on Trees of Great Britain and Ireland, assisted by Professor Henry, the Cambridge botanist, who had spent much time collecting rare species in China. Henry too would sometimes stay at Colesbourne and I would be allowed to accompany them on their forestry and botanical expeditions.

On one of these Henry pointed out to Elwes rather a special variety of elm. He was not at all dogmatic but only tentatively put this suggestion forward. "I don't agree with you," said Elwes, whereupon Henry attempted to point out the very slight botanical variation and handed his pocket magnifying lens to Elwes so that he could better examine the flower of the tree for himself.

"I don't agree with you, Henry," repeated Elwes. "Now if you would only listen to me," and he gave his own opinion at some length. Naturally Henry listened but said no more. The following day I was walking alone with Elwes. As we came to the elm tree discussed on the previous day, Elwes took up a stance, undid his coat, hooked his thumbs in his waistcoat, faced the elm and addressed me in rather a fierce tone of voice:

"Baker, this elm is not what you think it is. I have made a discovery: far from being a common English elm, Ulmus campestris, this is likely to be related to the Huntingdon elm, and if you are not convinced that I am right I would ask you to examine the flower, when you will discover for yourself that my opinion is correct."

Had Elwes forgotten that I had listened to the argument the day before or was it his way of instructing me on the identification of forest trees? Years afterwards on my return from Africa, it was my good fortune to stay at Colesbourne with his son Colonel Elwes and become more intimate with the woodlands and the family. Many were the days I devoted to forestry there.


::


Monday, February 01, 2010

Timelapse of Alps with Moonlight

Sunday, January 31, 2010

God as Basis of One Common Faith

One Common Faith,


as taught by John Amos Comenius


By John Taylor; 2010 Jan 31, Sultan 12, 166 BE



Historians of science warn students to avoid studying the science of past ages in an anachronistic way by blithely assuming that investigators of nature in the ancient and medieval worlds understood science anything like we do today. Not only do we possess a much larger base of dependable knowledge but also our very definition of science and the scientific method have changed radically over the past two centuries.


A modern scientist is radically different a "natural philosopher" of the past. Although we have a huge variety of scientific disciplines, they all benefit from a large body of common scientific presuppositions that everyone calling himself a scientist is assumed to be familiar with. How otherwise could the members of an international, interdisciplinary institution like the UN's Panel on Climate Change even talk to one another, much less come to common agreement on the dangers of climate change? Even our lay understanding of science is infinitely more sophisticated; today, we expect every educated person to have some familiarity with basic scientific facts, especially since we have all studied elementary science for at least a decade in our youth.


Governments and corporations spend billions of dollars every year, in effect betting that scientific research will bear fruit and that society will know enough to apply it safely. We all benefit from the common understanding of science taught in schools and universities around the world.


Unfortunately, none of this can be said about religion. As with science centuries ago, there is no received definition of religion. Students in public schools are lucky to be taught that religions exist at all, and it is not universal for parochial schools to expose students to more than one of the world's religious traditions. Experts and the public alike fail to see common features among any two religions, much less among them all. Nor is there a consensus even as to what religion is, much less one that is taught in schools. We do not expect every educated citizen to know religion as they do science, or that religions will change, or even can change. While many faith groups do evolve rapidly, others are indistinguishable in core beliefs from what they were centuries and even millennia ago.


Teachers have no confidence that even if schools did teach world religions, that commonalities among faiths would be discernable, or even that students would gain from learning that. Worst of all, there is a common idea, held by religious and secular alike, that faith most come as a bolt from the blue, that it is a kind of knowledge that cannot be taught. This is an insidious misconception. As Thomas Hobbes pointed out in the 17th Century, such an attitude hardly leads to lawfulness or good citizenship, rather it instils an insidious individualism that exterminates all hope of common ground in matters of faith.


"It hath been also commonly taught that faith and sanctity are not to be attained by study and reason, but by supernatural inspiration or infusion. Which granted, I see not why any man should render a reason of his faith; or why every Christian should not be also a prophet; or why any man should take the law of his country rather than his own inspiration for the rule of his action." (Hobbes, Leviathon, Ch. 24, Of the Things that weaken or tend to the dissolution of a commonwealth)


John Amos Comenius had no truck with such religious exceptionalism. It is the duty of writers about religion to teach it in such a way that all serious believers, no matter what tradition they come from, will agree with what is being said.


"Religion or Theology must be so written that it is necessarily acknowledged by adherents of every existing religion or sect, Christian, Jew or Mohammedan, as the one and only way unto God and blessed eternity." (Comenius, Panorthosia, Ch. 13, para 12, p. 203)


Religious leaders must broaden their concern from the exclusive good of their own flocks to that of all humanity. Playing with the common sound in Latin of the words for "ecumenical" and "economic" (household management), Comenius urged his fellow Christians to broaden the scope of their ecumenicalism to the entire household of humanity.


"It has been customary in the past to convene ecumenical councils where bishops from all the Christian countries assembled to consult about the business of the whole church. But we shall have a truly economic council only if we assemble enlightened men from all over the habitable world, philosophers, churchmen, and politicians of outstanding eminence in wisdom, piety, and prudence pledged to introduce plans at long last full enough to secure, establish, and increase the safety of all mankind." (Panorthosia, Ch. 25, para 1, p. 128)


He believed that the first step to his proposed democratic parliament of religions would be for every school to teach world religions, starting at the primary level. Here the fundamentals of religion would be taught to everybody, as science is today. The trappings of religion distract and divide more than they unite; they can safely be ignored by a world curriculum. If teachers avoid needless externals, the specific doctrine, dogma, laws and rituals that make up the facade of world religions, they will have time to teach what benefits us all, a purified understanding of God and what He has to teach in Holy Scripture. What is more, this reading of scripture should be done with a view to action and application rather than as historical documents or dead letters.


"I contend that if we ensure in our schools in future that only the Books of God are explained, and these only are applied by the churches to men's consciences and by political systems to the government of our affairs, we shall certainly produce mental light and a semblance of uniformity in our affairs." (Comenius, Panorthosia II, Ch. 8, para 34, p. 123)


This is similar to how a good science teacher instructs today, not not merely trying to instil a body of scientific findings but rather introducing students to how scientists think, to the essential elements of the scientific method.


Just as science includes common goals for both experts and society, this educational program should aim at establishing a common faith for every world citizen. This would start with a long period of meeting, mixing and reconciliation among members of formerly warring religious traditions. In this process, we all would learn to understand and talk about faith in ways that do not alienate or antagonize one another. Each believer should be able to feel that all respect his or her traditions and beliefs and that it is welcomed and included in the faith common to all.


"It is necessary also to look for agreement in the process of reconciliation, which will mean that we are prepared to make every possible concession to one another. It is to be hoped that this will be easily obtained through seeking a compromise even in cases of apparent contradiction. For when everyone sees that his own opinions and arguments are not being rejected but only adapted to the general universal feeling, would anyone in his senses choose to disagree and engage in further conflict? For any man would prefer his own possessions to be left intact or only limited in the interests of general harmony, and if he saw the fighting ended on these terms he would surely congratulate himself and others on a bloodless victory and unexpected triumphs in the cause of truth." (Comenius, Panorthosia II, Ch. 8, para 44, p. 128)


Comenius agreed with Bacon that the main obstacle in establishing both a common science and a common religion is the faith that it is possible to do so. If we think we can, we can, and if we think it is impossible, it is. Since the Bible teaches that "with God, all things are possible," it would be impious for any adherent of a monotheistic religion to doubt that this is possible. We can make it all the more possible by using God, the Being with Whom all becomes possible, as the cornerstone of the common faith of the human race. I will give Comenius the last word on this.



==========



God Must be the Basis of the One Common Faith


"You will say that it all depends on whether this is possible. My answer is to admit that disagreements in philosophy, religion, and politics have grown so strong that it is impossible for us to be reconciled through self-reform, but it is possible through nature and through God, who is the foundation of nature.


"For nature remains the same for all men, regardless of our differences. The earth indeed supports all men equally, even although we should prefer it to swallow up those whom we hate. The sun looks upon all men with equally direct rays, irrespective of our habit of looking askance at one another. A rose smells equally sweet to Jews and Christians, and so on. Similarly God is the God of all, and every word that he speaks is addressed to all who are ready to listen.


"Therefore, if we only look upon our own dogmas and books and works, (which we ourselves have produced in a thousand varieties), we are wholly incapable of reconciliation; but if we accept with due attention and reverence God's thoughts concerning us, and His actions, words and inspirations given to us for our use, reconciliation will be very easy." (Comenius, Panorthosia II, Ch. 8, para 29, p. 121)


(Comenius, Panorthosia II, Ch. 8, para 29, p. 121)



::

Our Monthly Fireside

Contributed by Betty Frost (for the Dunnville Chronicle)

To the Editor

This coming Wednesday, February 10th there will be a meeting in the Garfield Disher Room at 8:00 p.m. sponsored by the Haldimand Baha’i community.  We are very fortunate to have as our speaker, Terry Spratt, whose knowledge not only of the Baha’i teachings but of history and the current world condition is quite vast.  Those of us who have heard him speak here before have always been impressed with how articulate and knowledgeable he is.  His background is in Philosophy, teaching English literature and the study of world religions.  His graduate interest was in International Relations. Terry has travelled extensively, visiting at least 18 countries.

When asked to give a brief summary about his subject, he was very brief indeed - stating that he will focus on Religion as the basis/impulse of civilization with attention to current history which reflects the decline of culture and rise of mediocrity and spectacle.  With this as a general background, he will also bring in the challenging question of what happened in Haiti.  No doubt his summation of the situation will not only be centered on that unfortunate country, but on why it should have happened and what responsibility the rest of the world has to prevent a similar
disaster.

There will be an opportunity for questions and a social period with the usual refreshments.  Please join us for what we believe will be an illuminating evening.

Betty Frost
Haldimand Baha’i community


AROUND TOWN
Wednesday, Feb. 10th

An interesting speaker will again come to Dunnville - Terry Spratt - whose background in Philosophy, teaching of English literature and a study of International Relations will provide him with tools needed to speak on the subject of “Religion as the basis/impulse of civilization with attention on current history with the decline of culture and the rise of mediocrity and spectacle.”  The meeting will start at 8:00 p.m. in the Garfield Disher room of Dunnville’s library.  All are welcome.  Sponsored by the Haldimand Baha’i community.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Comenian Outline

An Outline of Comenian Governance

By John Taylor; 2010 Jan 29, Sultan 10, 166 BE



There follows here the umpteenth draft of the introduction to my book-in-progress, People without Borders. My apologies to regular readers for the repetition.


Comenian world government


The Enlightenment project in the 18th Century proposed that progress toward an ideal enlightened state can be attained through science alone. Religion can safely be left out of the equation. Faith is at best a distraction, at worst inherently harmful. It is reactionary, corrupt and prone to fundamentalism. For over a century the spectacular advance of scientific research seemed to justify this notion, especially in physics and medicine. Since the close of the 20th Century, though, it has become clear that in spite of its many benefits, scientific knowledge has also contributed to potentially lethal threats to human survival. To name only two striking examples, we now live under the constant threats of both nuclear Armageddon and accelerating global warming.


The cause of human betterment would have been better served had there been no divorce between science and religion, for ultimately the purposes of both are the same, the betterment of humanity. Although they have slightly different purposes and methods, and they deal in vastly different scales of time and space, as long as they recognize and keep within their limitations both can enrich human experience and conduce to progress and enlightenment.


Rather than drawing false dichotomies and bringing these essential kinds of knowledge into competition, we should heed the latter writings of one pre-enlightenment genius who straddled all three of the great potential sources of human progress: politics, science and religion. John Amos Comenius was an experienced peace negotiator, a renowned educational reformer, a founding father of the Royal Society, and a leader in his religious community, the Moravian Brotherhood.


His long experience in these three fields inspired his posthumous masterpiece, the Panorthosia, or Universal Reform, a detailed proposal for a comprehensive reform program that works simultaneously on the personal, local and planetary levels. Panorthosia details how we might strike a happy balance among science, politics and religion. This is by far the most persuasive proposal for a world government ever put forward.


Proposition: the best government conceivable, one far more reliable and efficient than any in the past, should run a world order.


The most common objection to world government is ancient, familiar even in the time of Comenius. The argument goes that world government may well degrade into a tyranny, as have so many well-intentioned regimes in the past. By its very nature, a planetary autocracy would be more oppressive and intrusive than geographically limited authoritarian regimes because it would be impossible to escape. Barring space travel, there would be no escape into exile.

In Panorthosia, Comenius proposes a unique design for a world government that systematically decentralizes power. Its very structure excludes individual leaders and prevents orthodoxies or ideologies from gaining ascendancy. It is inspired by what is often regarded as impossibly idealistic, the dictum in the Sermon on the Mount to see to it that we "call no man master."


A world republic based on this model would not be solely political, or merely religious, or exclusively scientific, but a carefully balanced union of the best of each. Most importantly, it would encourage individuals to strike the same balance in their own lives among practical action, spiritual piety and learning scientifically. A Comenian world government would consist of democratically elected continental parliaments functioning semi-independently of one another. In matters of international law and universal policy, these continental bodies would unite in a tripartite world parliament consisting of three separate, core institutions, disparate in jurisdiction and function but harmonious in purpose.


Thus the universal parliament of humanity intentionally diffuses power. It functions by relying on indirect influence through a world-embracing network of affiliation by common design and methodology, rather than direct fiat. That is, its threefold structure is in some way reflected on each level of society and, like a tuning fork, the vibration of one prong sets forth a harmonic vibration that is heard, understood and expressed everywhere, at every level, especially on the periphery. Thus, individuals, families and neighbourhoods all respond to governance in the center by finding their own balance among common religious, scientific and political experiences and expressions.


The Cosmopolitan Condition and the UCS


In People without Borders I will adapt two Kantian terms to refer to the condition of the world after a de-centralized Comenian world government forms. The first term, "cosmopolitan condition," refers to the ways of thinking and acting that all or most individuals will adopt when the first constitutional and therefore permanent peace comes into being. Continuing the analogy of the tuning fork, the cosmopolitan condition is the form and material of the fork, the shape and strength that make it vibrate as a single entity. The second term, universal civic society (or UCS), I will use to describe the new social structure that planetary unification will permit. The UCS is, then, the musical instrument that a skilled technician, using the vibrations of the fork, puts into perfect tune.


A World Infrastructure


Cosmopolitan reform in the UCS permits us to contemplate a rebuild of our infrastructure from the ground up, including quicker, more efficient travel, the elimination of combustion through electrification using renewable power sources, and new ways of building. Combining these infrastructural improvements would not only avoid pollution, greenhouse gas emissions and other negative impact on the environment but would also maximize the freedom, welfare and security of residents.


As local human potential learns to express religion, science and politics in balance, plans and policy promulgated by the universal parliament will commensurately grow stronger and more effective. Since the mutual tie between the collective center and the individual is not forced but indirect, not dictatorial but ineffable and spiritual in nature, there can be no degradation into arbitrary measures, corruption or manipulation. Democracy itself will for the first time be subject to evolutionary improvement.


A World Electoral System


Instead of "one man, one vote," a new electoral system would offer each individual three votes in three ongoing election cycles, based on a repeating ten year world plan. Each of the three election cycles supports its respective world institution, the religious and spiritual institution, the scientific and educational body, and the institution for politics, peace and practical policymaking. Thus, the triple voting franchise confers upon each human being one vote as a believer, one as a worker and one as a citizen.


As believers, each elects members of an affiliated interfaith institution at each level of society, starting at the household and neighbourhood level and extending right up to the world parliament of religions.


The same applies for our vote as a worker and as citizen. In a Comenian system, everybody is a worker. In this role as tradespersons, professionals, experts or teachers, each votes in an affiliated scientific and professional body, again at the local, neighbourhood, continental and world levels. The general purpose of these institutions of science and education is to promote the enlightenment of humankind. As part of this, they will regulate science and technology and work out an educational curriculum, not only for schools and universities but also for the press, the Internet and other media.


Similarly, as citizens we will elect once every decade a political institution that will keep the peace at each level, right up to the political parliament.



Next Time:

A World Financial System

A World Intelligentsia

World Security


::

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Recent Persecution of Baha'is in Iran

 Quenching The Light highlights the persecutions of Baha'is in Iran. It features the paintings of Baha'i martyrs mixed with live video footage of the decedents of the martyrs.  



Coverage of the Trials of Baha'is by TV in India

 

For all four parts of this report:

http://iranian.com/main/blog/faryarm/coverage-trials-indian-tv

Invitation to the Monthly Meeting that I Animate

Philosopher’s Café

A second Thursday of the month destination for provocative, insightful discussion around ideas and issues that matter.

Thursday, February 11 6:30 p.m. in the Library’s meeting room
Topic for discussion:

“Responsibility”


•    Everyone welcome. Drop in for refreshments and a lively discussion.

•    There is no fee to participate.

•    No formal philosophy training required; real life experience desired.

Wainfleet Township Public Library
19M9 Park Street, P.O. Box 118 Wainfleet, ON L0S 1V0 905-899-1277 www.wainfleetlibrary.ca

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Amanda's Eulogy for Ann Nichols

Ann Nichols





It is nigh on a year since Ann Nichols passed from our midst. The Baha'is of Haldimand miss her sorely.

On the occasion, I wrote the following eulogy for Ann at:


http://badiblog.blogspot.com/search?q=Ann+nichols


One of Ann's foster daughters, Amanda Lynn Tremeer, has recently declared her faith in Baha'u'llah. She requested that I post on the Badi' Blog her own eulogy for Ann, which I include below.













==========



Our Mother Margaret Ann Nichols.



She was our everything. She had open doors for all the children, I feel that it is right to say that we are all Ann's children.


I came to live with My Mom Ann when I was about eight or nine, when I first met her, there was a glow on her face, as I walked through her doors, for once in my life I felt love and kindness, her smile was so lovely. I felt at home. Through the years my mother would teach us the blessed writings of the faith, she would teach us everything that she knew (and the classes with Marylou Speer).


When I heard of my mothers passing, I went to Dunnville that very day to stand beside my sister's side. As soon as I walked through the doors, I went right to my mothers bed. This was the household meeting place, our poor mother never had space. Where she was we always there, right beside her.


As I prayed at her bedside, I started to cry. I got up, making my mother's bed the way that she had taught us to do. Then I lay one single rose one my mothers pillow, with her Baha'i prayer book that she would always read from. At that moment I knew that our Father had taken mother home.


I remember when I gave birth to my daughter, Caitlyn. I was talking to my mother from the hospital phone. She could not make it to the hospital, so she read me prayers over the phone. Thirty minutes later, Caitlyn Marion Dianne Bridges was born. I called Mom, I told her the words that are still fresh today,


"Guess what Mom, you are a grandmother!"


"Call Jolene right away to tell her that she is an auntie!"


My mother cried with joy.


Even though I was not her blood child, even though I married and painted my own future, Ann was my mother. I was not a foster child in her eyes; I was one of her daughters.


Our Mother's birthday was January 1st. This year, her granddaughter put bright blue roses on the top of hear head stone, and gave the angel on the ground a kiss. We sang happy birthday. My daughter, almost three now, looked up at me and said,


"Mommy, we come more to bring Grandma flowers."


My reply was,


"Your grandmother had love for flowers you know. Of course we can."


Even though she is gone, there is not a day that goes by where I do not think of her. And the funniest thing, she is not gone. She still lives. We are right under her nose, like when we were little.


Jolene and Ann did wonders for us children. God blessed me with a Mother and a sister. That I will always hold deep in my heart.


Thank you for reading this.


Amanda Lynn Tremeer
Posted by Picasa

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Bar and Bat Mitzvahs in a UCS











The Cosmopolitan Mitzvah


By John Taylor; 2010 Jan 26, Sultan 08, 166 BE




Lately, I stumbled across a site on the Web showing charts illustrating the impressive career achievements of Jews over past centuries. In spite of their small population, the names of Jews turn up in highly disproportionate numbers on honour lists. An astonishing number have attained the highest possible distinction in their field of endeavour, including the Nobel Prize, Oscars, any honour you can name. This is all the more amazing when you consider that IQ studies have consistently failed to uncover any mental superiority on average among Jews. It is true that Judaism values learning highly. As Steven L. Pease points out in his book, The Golden Age of Jewish Achievement, the Jews were the first tribe to mandate universal literacy. However, since then other, less gifted nations and cultures have become literate, and many value knowledge no less than Jews. What is it about Jews -- not, it seems, Israelis but Diaspora Jews -- that makes their careers so brilliant?


Myself, I suspect that the Jewish bar and bat Mitzvah ceremony is a factor in their high achievement. Many recent educational studies have found that this age, around when a child reaches middle school, is a crucial period to later development. It often make the difference between drifting into failure and having a mission in life. To find direction at the age of 13, when the bar and bat Mitzvah takes place, is the basis of success later on. Failure to find oneself at this age can make it all but impossible to recover from later on.


The bar Mitzvah ceremony is highly demanding for Jewish junior youth, requiring a great deal of study and preparation on their part. At the same time, the ceremony extends to them tremendous adulation, attention and offers of support from both God and the community. It is safe to say that the lack of a coming-of-age ceremony in an industrial and post-industrial society is the main cause of maladjustment, shiftless and dislocation in adult life. It is a major reason why moderns tend to be unhappy, compared to simpler, aboriginal cultures that continue their traditions of initiating their young into their ranks.
After a world government forms, that is, in a Cosmopolitan Condition, I would like to see the Mitzvah be a universal transition to adulthood, as universal a requirement as literacy and numeracy. Every youth should undergo his or her own special coming-of-age ceremony that is in some way equivalent to the bar and bat Mitzvah ceremony. As with the bar and bat Mitzvah, it should be designed to put the adolescent in touch with his or her heritage, both religious and cultural.


However, instead of concentrating only on religion, I would like the study for a Cosmopolitan Mitzvah to cover everything that is needed to be a well-rounded human being in a Universal Civic Society. Make it, to use the term Kant used in his essay, "What is Enlightenment?", a "Release from Tutelage Ceremony." Make it a mix of personal and official elements -- though less free ranging and idiosyncratic than the content of some modern weddings. Make it something to which parents, the child's ethnicity, language, religion, local community, all have contributed to and benefited from.
Ideally, in a Cosmopolitan Condition the educational system would be efficient enough to prepare a fifteen year old to be at least potentially independent at this age. That way a Cosmopolitan Mitzvah ceremony could also include a graduation ceremony from trade school and apprenticeship. That way the youth would be qualified, if need be, to go out, marry and start her own family; at the very least the initiate should be able financially to support herself on her own using the skills she has mastered in elementary school.


This is just the base requirement for a Cosmopolitan Mitzvah, however. A new adult should also demonstrate competence in all three of the basic elements of a well-rounded human being. That is, she should be a logical thinker, a competent executive and a moral agent contemplating the eternal. That means having some basic competence in philosophy, politics and religion. John Amos Comenius concisely sums up what each of these fields covers:
"Philosophy deals with books and knowledge and the reasons for things for the purpose of enlightening mankind. Politics deals with rule and authority for the purpose of keeping mankind in order. Religion deals with God and conscience for the purpose of kindling in mankind the flame of faith, charity and hope (or keeping it alight)." (Panorthosia, Ch. 13, para 12, p. 205)


In this essay series, we have considered the possibility that a cosmopolis will require world citizens to vote in elections and even use a special currency designed for each of these three universal elements of human endeavour. A Cosmopolitan Mitzvah ceremony would require, therefore, that the young adult have enough basic knowledge to vote intelligently in each of the three types of election, and to get and spend each of their currencies in a productive way. Let us look at each of them in turn.


==========


"Philosophy deals with books and knowledge and the reasons for things for the purpose of enlightening mankind."


A youth should be familiar with the scientific method and be ready to apply it in his or her trade, or, if so inclined, in her future profession. Having finished her apprenticeship and attained the journeyman level, she should now be ready to teach these skills to younger apprentices, as well as promoting for the benefit of the general public the special lessons and values for which this area of knowledge stands. She should say what she will look for when she votes and what virtues and qualities she would like to bring when she serves as a world citizen. She also should state how she has spent the eduterra currency that has so far come into her hands, and how she plans to spend this money in future.


==========


"Politics deals with rule and authority for … keeping mankind in order."


The youth should be able to stand up in public and summarize what she has learned and accomplished so far in life, and what her hopes and dreams are for the future. She should state concisely, in both general and specific terms, what she believes, what she seeks to learn and what she plans to accomplish during her life and career. She should say what she thinks is important policy, and what goals she wants for her family, neighbourhood, right up to the continental and world level. She should say how she plans to follow through on that in her voting and her use of the paxterra currency.


==========


"Religion deals with God and conscience for the purpose of kindling in mankind the flame of faith, charity and hope (or keeping it alight)."
A student should demonstrate the lessons she has learned from direct experience with her traditional or family religion, and any other religion she may have chosen. She should show basic cosmopolitan knowledge of spirituality by talking about at least two other religions or faith traditions. She should state what she believes and how she carries out that belief in her worship, her past and future charitable support using the ecuterra currency, and in the hope she inspires in her contacts and relationships with friends and family.


==========


Since this Cosmopolitan coming of age ceremony is new for virtually everybody except Jews and a few remnant hunter-gatherer cultures, I would like to see it supported and promoted as an institution. Scientists and educators should study it as carefully as possible; they should keep long term records of what was said by each adolescent. That way, the elements of the ceremony that a child brings who later gains distinction in life and career can be used as feedback for the Mitzvahs of the next generation.


::

Monday, January 25, 2010

We are Trees, not Machines

Imitation and the Crossfire Syndrome


By John Taylor; 2010 Jan 25, Sultan 07, 166 BE



A couple of years ago I compared our complacency in the face of global warming to the no-man's-land between opposing in a war zone, a land owned by nobody and opposed by all for no reason. I even personified the owner of this disputed territory; I called him Adolph Nobody. Whenever you get personal attacks based on ideology and fixed opinions, our common ground becomes disputed territory, and it is safest to stay low, no matter what you think. Adolph Nobody is the enemy of all, extremists and moderates alike. This is why all Holy Scriptures forbid gossip and backbiting.



Lately I ran across the following passage from a speech that Michael Crichton gave almost twenty years ago, where he calls this problem the "crossfire syndrome." He is talking about the press to reporters, but this way of thinking applies to every section of society I think.



"Worse still, characterization lies at the heart of the impulse to polarize every issue - what we might call the Crossfire Syndrome.  We are all assumed, these days, to reside at one extreme of the opinion spectrum, or another. We are pro-abortion or anti-abortion. We are free traders or protectionist. We are pro-private sector or pro-big government. We are feminists or chauvinists. But in the real world, few of us holds these extreme views. There is instead a spectrum of opinion." (Michael Crichton, Speech given to the National Press Club, Washington D.C., April 7, 1993, http://www.crichton-official.com/speech-mediasaurus.html)



I have to wonder how this speech came across to the lickspittles in Washington. He roundly blames journalists for what he calls out and out incompetence at their job by refusing to take the time to ask nuanced questions, or wait for detailed replies. He even tells a funny story of how an Inuit instantly knew whether it was a television, radio or print reporter just by the amount of time he spent interviewing his people. Myself, I do not blame the pawns, the rooks, the queen or the king; I blame the player who moves them all. That is, I blame the owners of the press. Anything less than a representative ownership by all humans of the press subjects it to manipulation. Incompetence is not the problem; the problem is that they know very well what they are doing. Crichton continues:



"The extreme positions of the Crossfire Syndrome require extreme simplification - framing the debate in terms which ignore the real issues. For example, when I watch Crossfire, or Nightline, or MacNeil-Lehrer, I often think, wait a minute. The real issue isn't term limits; it's campaign finance reform. The real issue isn't whether gasoline tax is regressive, it's national security -- whether we'd prefer to go back to war in the Gulf instead of reducing oil consumption by taxing it more heavily, as every other nation does. The real issue isn't whether the US should have an industrial policy, it is whether the one we have - because no policy is a policy - serves us well. The issue isn't whether Mickey Kantor is a protectionist, it's how the US should respond to its foreign competitors."



Not coincidentally, the issues that Creighton points out here are all deeply engrained in the root causes of climate change, and we still swallow red herrings that keep us from addressing the real issue. He goes on to point out, all too correctly, that both the cause and the effect of polarization and redirection is blind prejudice and imitation.



"This polarization of the issues has contributed greatly to our national paralysis, it posits false choices which stifle debate that is essential for change to occur. It is ironic that this should happen in a time of great social upheaval, when our society needs more than ever to be able to experiment with different viewpoints. But in the media world, a previously-established idea, like a previously-elected politician, enjoys a tremendous advantage over any challenger.

"Hence the familiar ideas continue to be repeated, long past their demonstrable validity. More than two decades after right-brain, left-brain thinking was discredited in scientific circles, those metaphors are still casually repeated in the media. After thirty years of government efforts to banish racism, persistent racial inequality suggests the need for fresh perspectives; those perspectives are rarely heard. And more than three decades after the women's movement began amid media ridicule, the men's movement finds itself ridiculed in exactly the same way - often by leading feminists, who appear to have learned little from their own ordeals."



The measure of man is man, not Adolph Nobody. Equanimity and temperance impossible if the crossfire syndrome dominates the discussion of public affairs. Conflict perverts the forum of opinion and makes it into a war zone, a no-man's-land. As J.S. Mill pointed out in "On Liberty," freedom is a good thing only if use of it makes us fully rounded human beings. This happens if and only if we go to the trouble of working out truth for ourselves. This is only done by avoiding the facsimile of truth, which is imitation.



"He who lets the world, or his own portion of it, choose his plan of life for him, has no need of any other faculty than the ape-like one of imitation. He who chooses his plan for himself, employs all his faculties. He must use observation to see, reasoning and judgment to foresee, activity to gather materials for decision, discrimination to decide, and when he has decided, firmness and self-control to hold to his deliberate decision. And these qualities he requires and exercises exactly in proportion as the part of his conduct which he determines according to his own judgment and feelings is a large one.


"It is possible that he might be guided in some good path, and kept out of harm's way, without any of these things. But what will be his comparative worth as a human being? It really is of importance, not only what men do, but also what manner of men they are that do it.


"Among the works of man, which human life is rightly employed in perfecting and beautifying, the first in importance surely is man himself. Supposing it were possible to get houses built, corn grown, battles fought, causes tried, and even churches erected and prayers said, by machinery -- by automatons in human form -- it would be a considerable loss to exchange for these automatons even the men and women who at present inhabit the more civilised parts of the world, and who assuredly are but starved specimens of what nature can and will produce.


"Human nature is not a machine to be built after a model, and set to do exactly the work prescribed for it, but a tree, which requires to grow and develop itself on all sides, according to the tendency of the inward forces which make it a living thing." (J.S. Mill, On Liberty)


::

The Impossible Hamster




Explanation of the animation


What the impossible hamster has to teach us about economic growth. A new animation from nef (the new economics foundation), scripted by Andrew Simms, numbers crunched by Viki Johnson and pictures realised by Leo Murray.

www.neweconomics.org
www.onehundredmonths.org
www.wakeupfreakout.org
www.impossiblehamster.org

We wanted to confront people with the meaning and logical conclusion of the promise of endless economic growth. We used a hamster to illustrate what would happen if there were no limits to growth because they double in size each week before reaching maturity at around 6 weeks. But if a hamster grew at the same rate until its first birthday, wed be looking at a nine billion tonne hamster, which ate more than a years worth of world maize production every day. There are reasons in nature, why things dont grow indefinitely. As things are in nature, sooner or later, so they must be in the economy. As economic growth rises, we are pushing the planet ever closer to, and beyond some very real environmental limits. With every doubling in the global economy we use the equivalent in resources of all of the previous doublings combined.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Iranian Dream

Words to the Iranian People


Last night I dreamed I was serving on an Assembly, sitting around a table with the three Iranian members of our institution. We did not have a quorum yet, as the Canadian members had not arrived for some reason. Then it transpired that we were in Iran, and there was a Mullah standing there ready to execute us all. Part of me was surprised and horrified. I am going to die for my Faith! Then I realized that this was a unique situation; I might soon be the only Canadian Baha'i and Assembly member in history to be martyred! I felt like Zoidberg:


"What an honor, a personal aspiration come true."


Slowly I rose out of the dream state with the thought: I am not going to say a word to this Mullah, I am going to demand to speak to the people of Iran. I want to point out to them the direction they are going. I woke further and thought, well I could at least write about that subject today. Then I realized that I must be dreaming even more now that I am awake than when I slept, since I have nothing to say to these people. Then I remembered this, which I came across in a science magazine soon after the Port au Prince quake:


"Haiti Earthquake Disaster Little Surprise to Some Seismologists, January 13, 2010"


Although seismic predictions work on geologic timescales and can miss big quakes by decades, one expert said last week that a temblor in Port-au-Prince was of greater concern than a San Andreas slip,


"The Enriquillo-Plaintain Garden Fault is one of dozens around the world that run through populous, but often poorly prepared, areas. Last week, Yeats also called the city of Tehran "a time bomb that is waiting to go off." The North Tehran Fault could unleash an earthquake similarly massive to the one anticipated to strike southern California in the coming decades. But in the Iranian capital, he says, despite advanced regional technology, many of the buildings are not shake-proof. Other worrisome locales, he notes, are Lima, Peru, and Karachi, Pakistan, as well as much of Turkey, where many areas are ... unsafely built due to corruption or poverty."


We must learn how important it is to do things right, especially to build things right. I watched on TVO an interview with a seismologist who recalled a striking picture of three buildings in a Japanese city after a similar 7.0 earthquake to the one that just occurred in Haiti. They happened to be adjacent to one another, one a traditional style wooden building, which had been flattened, killing everybody in it; the second a 1960's vintage concrete building, which partly collapsed with heavy damage but no loss of life; the third was a new building, up to code, which had no damage at all.


Another bit of advice for Iranians is to raise up the lot of women. Islam should be a great advantage in the fight against poverty. For one thing, it prohibits the consumption of alcohol. I have been reading some of 19th Century reformer Flora Tristan's reports on the lot of the poor working class in France. She observed what is still common in poor areas today, that alcohol is a major factor in the cycle of poverty. Yet I have to wonder why there are still large numbers of poor in Muslim lands. True, alcohol is often replaced by hashish, opium and other chemicals. However, I think another, more important drag to progress is the degradation of women. As long as they do not have equal access to education, poverty and factionalism will continue to grind down the family in Iran. Tristan wrote,


"All the ills of the working class are summed up by these two words: poverty and ignorance, ignorance and poverty. But to get out of this labyrinth, I see only one way: to start by educating women, because women are entrusted with raising the children, male and female." ("A Passage From Flora Tristan's l'Union Ouvriere," Translated by Doris and Paul Beik http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwart/hist255/at/tristan_text.html)

She made this observation 1844, years before the principle of equality of the sexes was proclaimed in Iran at the conference of Badasht. Badasht was broken up by an angry, deluded mob. Imagine how little poverty there would be in Iran if the reactionary clergy who incited this mob had not taken up the repression of women as a mark of Muslim piety.


Another Baha'i teaching is the elimination of gossip and backbiting. This is also in the Qur'an and the Bible as well. The Qur'an compares it to cannibalism. The Bible hints that it is what makes for the sort of slackers who, for instance, build substandard buildings in earthquake prone areas.

"The words of a gossip are like dainty morsels: They go down into a person's innermost parts. One who is slack in his work is brother to him who is a master of destruction." (Prov 18:8,9, WEB)


That is why I would advise you to eliminate words of war from the public forum. Think of the slackers who built Teheran, flouting basic building codes... Remember the opening words of the Qur'an, which warn that God, the Master of the Day of Judgment, will be merciful to all, save those whose "portion is wrath," for against such will come judgment.


"In the name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. Praise be to God, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the world; Most Gracious, Most Merciful; Master of the Day of Judgment. Thee do we worship, and Thine aid we seek. Show us the straight way, the way of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy Grace, those whose (portion) is not wrath, and who go not astray." (Qur'an 1:1-7, Yusuf Ali tr)



::

Friday, January 22, 2010

Crimes Against Free Speech

Flora Tristan, Women and Reparation



By John Taylor; 2010 Jan 22, Sultan 04, 166 BE


"King as thou art, free speech at least is mine

To make reply; in this I am thy peer."

(Teiresias, in Oedipus Rex)



I have been researching the life and writings of Flora Tristan. Never heard of her? She is the one that Marx and Engels plagiarized to write their Communist Manifesto. She died several months after the Bab declared His mission, in November of 1844. Every educated person is expected to have heard of these two truculent men whose Manifesto, it has been said, makes everyone who reads it want to go out and kill a member of the bourgeoisie.


But nobody outside of France and Peru has even heard of her.


Extremes and extremism hit the mark. Her more moderate message was too nice, too womanly and conciliatory. She called for a union of workers, not a violent slave revolt. She called for constructive cooperatives, not forced egalitarianism. She believed in God, Marx and Engel were atheists. She called not only for equality of women but also for a "moralizing mission" for women, one which, I must say, feminism has not consistently picked up on, to say the least. In any case, Tristan wrote something about the equality of the sexes that I had never thought of before. Here it is:


"By a very simple calculation it is obvious that wealth will increase indefinitely when women (half of the human race) are summoned to bring into social service their intelligence, strength, and ability. This is as easy to understand as that two is double one." (Flora Tristan, "A Passage From Flora Tristan's l'Union Ouvriere," Translated by Doris and Paul Beik, http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwart/hist255/at/tristan_text.html)


In the 170 odd years since she wrote that women have gained many rights, and indeed wealth has increased "indefinitely." Unfortunately, way over 80 percent of that wealth remains in the hands of a tiny, mostly male, minority. That elite keeps its arms firmly hugging its pile of money by the old tactic of divide and rule. Divide everything into groups and ideologies, then let some groups, the ones the elite sponsors, win out over all the others. The elite robs women of the right to enjoy the legitimate fruits of their labour. It keeps the vast majority of the human race in rags, as it did in Flora Tristan's time. It maintains its stranglehold by committing what I call:


A Crime Against Democracy


The law does not allow ER doctors to set off bombs in the street so as to injure people and drum up business. As soon as they do that, they cease to be healers and become terrorists. We can all see that if an individual subverts society, it is a crime. Carpenters cannot destroy buildings to reduce unemployment for their own. That is a crime. However, if a group with the proper connections does the same thing, well, we are less clear about that. Depends on the group.


"If the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech." - JUSTICE ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, writing for the majority in a Supreme Court decision overturning a ban on political spending by corporations." (Today's Headlines, New York Times on the Web, January 22, 2010)


This is a far-reaching ruling. It makes corporations untouchable. A corporation cannot even be punished, according to this, for using its legitimate right to free speech. Even if, as is now happening, that group's speech negates both the power of the people and the free speech of most individuals.


According to everything I have been reading and thinking lately, this is wrong.


There is a huge difference between what this judge equates here as indistinguishable: citizens and groups of citizens. They are not the same thing, and to treat them as such is injustice, pure and simple. You can either protect free speech for citizens or for groups, but not both. Citizens are human beings made of flesh and blood, created by God. Groups of citizens are creations of the human mind, not God. The former take precedence over the latter. Groups are a convenience, an appliance, nothing more.


For example, if everybody in the world voted to kill one innocent individual, they would not have the right to do so. Even if that individual agreed with them that he should die, that unanimous, universal vote would not suffice to make taking a life legal and moral. Like God, the human being, in Kant's language, an end in itself. The rights of the individual must be kept sacred and inalienable, and groups must defer to that. Groups may have certain rights, but they are necessarily conditional. Groups are expendable. If we extend to groups anything like the God-given rights that humans have, we negate the human rights of people.


This is why this supreme court ruling misses the point.


There is a crucial difference between a law-abiding group expressing its point of view and a company or interest group spending more money than the average citizen can hope to gain in a lifetime in order to corrupt the democratic process, to subvert the machinery of making laws. That is an act of subversion even more harmful than setting a bomb in a public place.


It is a crime against democracy.


Democracy is a tool designed to give the people equal access to free expression. Any group that subverts inalienable individual rights is, by definition, an enemy of the people, in other words, a monster.


This is not a new story. Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein immediately was understood as a metaphor for the newly invented corporate being, the charter company.


So the question remains: How do you fight a monster?


You cage it. You remove its ability to harm the people. The only just choice, then, is to take away the right to unfettered free speech from all companies, corporations, agencies, pressure groups, advertisers, any group at all. Take away their right to spend for such purposes; make it an exclusive human right, not a corporate one.

Pass strict laws forbidding corporations or any other interest group from spending money for anything other than strictly limited purposes. They can free talk about what is related to their corporate charter, a charter that is open and subject to revision by a ruling constitution. But only when such talk is in the public interest.


Advertising especially should be suspect. Let drug companies spend money on making better drugs, not on subverting health and society by making people perceive drug taking as an unavoidable necessity. Let a company discuss what it does with potential clients, but anything more broadcast is mental pollution, and should be repressed with the same severity that chemical pollution and the release of greenhouse gases is, or should be.


In a just world, and a just world will only be possible after the formation of a world government, we can expect that groups will be relegated to second place, after human beings. God will rise above human imagination. In that case, reparations will be due to women for the ongoing robbery over past centuries of their rightful share of the wealth.


Although some of what Flora Tristan now seems dated, I think the following points to where these reparation payments should go: to the level of the household, the domain of women, and the most neglected part of society.



"Woman is everything in the life of the workers. She is their sole providence. If she fails them, everything fails them. Consequently it is said: `It is the woman who makes or unmakes the household,' and this is the exact truth; that is why a proverb has been made of it. But what education, what teaching, what direction, what moral or physical development does the woman of the common people receive? None." (Ibid.)




::

Thursday, January 21, 2010

World Religion Day Celebration

Ron Speer put on a great show for world religion day on Sunday. Here is the report in our local newspaper.

Dunnville Celebrates the Joy in Religion

By CATHY PELLETIER , Dunnville Chcronicle

http://www.dunnvillechronicle.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2268403

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Moving Beyond Imagination

Beyond Effort of Imagination



By John Taylor; 2010 Jan 19, Sultan 01, 166 BE



Religulous, by Bill Maher



Religulous is not a movie I would pay to see, but as soon as I stumbled upon it yesterday in the Binbrook Library I borrowed and watched it. Comedian Bill Maher made this documentary as a statement of belief, and a way to convert theists to atheists, and atheists to anti-theists. It has a few funny moments, but mostly this comedian is deadly serious. His argument is summed up with a chart that he shows at one point comparing the number of non-believers in God (almost one in five Americans) to the number of gays, blacks, Jews and other groups. All of these are far fewer in number but far more influential in pushing their agendas. Why are non-theists, atheists and agnostics, so disunited and uncommitted?


Why indeed.


Surely it is one thing to not believe in something and quite another to stand up for it. It is contradictory base faith on a non-conviction. If such a thing were possible, I could make withdrawals from a bank account that I know does not exist; I could build a luxurious mansion on a piece of land that does not exist and that I do not own.


As a former anti-theist I am well familiar with the intellectual ammunition that Maher uses against religion. I used it myself when I was fifteen years old. Of course he presents it well, with modern multi-media illustrations. He enjoys stumping Christians with the many self-contradictions in the Bible. Jonah's being swallowed by a whale is similar to Santa and the tooth fairy. He heaves on their heads the bomb of the non-originality of Bible stories. Elements of events surrounding the life of Jesus are also found in the CV's of preceding gods, such as Horus, Osiris, Mythros, Krishna and various others. Therefore Jesus was not God.

When I see that old objection presented now, all it seems to prove is that story elements repeat. Plot devices are reused by storytellers over and over. There has to be a reason for that, especially when a movie or comedy routine like Maher's own seems dated after only a decade or two.


At my age and after a thousand brain draining migraines, details flow over me like water, but my daughter Silvie is quite sharp. She has become adept at pointing out repeating plots in everything we watch. For example, recently we viewed the Whoopy Goldberg comedy "The Associate," and she pointed out that it was the same story as an episode called "Todd," in the animated series "Dilbert." We rewatched the episode and noticed that Scott Adams had actually improved on the older story by introducing a satiric echo of God into the story of an imaginary partner who takes on a life of his own.


Last night we saw an episode called "The Child," in the second season of Star Trek, The Next Generation. It was about a benign "energy being" style of alien that decides to contact the Enterprise by impregnating a female crew member and running the child's pregnancy and childhood in fast forward. Then it finds its presence is harming the ship, so the kid voluntarily dies to save the ship. Both Mom and Sis were in tears, Dad and brother less so, but still interested.


Silvie pointed out that later on the Star Trek Voyager series repeated almost exactly the same story in an episode called "One." Is she refuting Star Trek, in the same way that anti-theists like Maher think they are refuting Christ? Or does the fact that the same story moves people to tears over many generations and millennia only prove that there is an element of truth, a characteristic of God and the universe that we all respond to at a deep level?


As if to back that idea up, Maher in an attempt to mock Christianity shows a modern passion play in a hokey Florida "Land of the Bible" theme park. An actor playing Jesus covered in dye is raised on a mechanical cross while a jet airliner crosses the sky in the background. The camera pans over to a small, elderly audience of fat tourists in deck chairs, most of whom are in tears. To me that just says, the story still works after two millennia. Why? The only conceivable reason it still moves is that it must be based on something real.


Maher has the same approach throughout. He does not take his arguments to learned or distinguished representatives of Christianity, Mormonism, Islam and Judaism. Rather he seeks out fringe elements and makes fun of their ignorance. At the same time, he does not attack really pathetic believers, like the dirt poor living in slums and favelas with their dreary lives without worldly hope but God. That would be just too pathetic, though they are the majority of believers, and of the human race.


Instead he goes to ignorant folk in America, who in a land of infinite opportunity openly reject science in exchange for religion, as if such a trade were necessary or even pleasing to God. Even so, he often tricks or bullies his marks into dropping their guard and saying something ridiculous. In spite of the deck being stacked against them, they sometimes do score points off Maher. The best riposte comes from the Holy Land theme-park Jesus, whom Maher interviews in full costume, as if he were talking to Jesus in the flesh. When Maher mocks the trinity this "Jesus" comes back with the response,


"The three in one is like the three phases of water, ice, liquid and vapour. It is always water, though it takes on different forms according to the ambient temperature."


Later Maher admits that he had been taken aback, saying, "It is nonsense on nonsense, and I am far from convinced by it, but I have to say I was not expecting that." I do not think that an idea like this is going to convince an atheist either, but it certainly shows that acting in a passion play makes you think about the story you are telling.


Abdu'l-Baha did talk about sacrifice being like the seed that sacrifices itself in order to become a tree, so the idea of God being like different states of water is not wholly ridiculous. However, in explaining the trinity he did stick to the Bab's analogy of the image in a mirror.


"But as to the question of the Trinity, know, O advancer unto God, that in each one of the cycles wherein the Lights have shone forth upon the horizons ... there are necessarily three things: The Giver of Grace, and the Grace, and the Recipient of the Grace; the Source of the Effulgence, and the Effulgence, and the Recipient of the Effulgence; the Illuminator, and the Illumination, and Illuminated." (Abdu'l-Baha, Tablets of Abdu'l-Baha v1, p. 117)


He also explains the trinity in Some Answered Questions, but I will not cite it all, only a very telling sentence that, I think, also hints at why these story elements are repeated so often, and why they have such an impact on the soul.


"A thing cannot be grasped by the intelligence except when it is clothed in an intelligible form; otherwise, it is but an effort of the imagination." (Abdu'l-Baha, Some Answered Questions, p. 115)




::

Monday, January 18, 2010

Corvee Succour

Corvee Labour in Succour of Haiti



The earthquake in Haiti is a grim reminder of how inadequate housing is, especially for the poor. Whereas in California a similar earthquake killed only about sixty, the one in Port au Prince doomed more than sixty thousand souls. Whenever a disaster like this takes place, I pull out my hair. How can such events be prevented? What could have been done to avoid all this suffering?


Surely in the future cosmopolitan condition everybody, no matter how poor or where they may live will have a home that is fireproof and earthquake proof, and reasonably secure against floods, hurricanes and other natural disasters. There must be a minimum standard building code enforced for every dwelling in the world. When disaster does strike, it should be routine to fly in large earthmoving machines and quickly construct permanent earthquake-proof shelter for the survivors. 


The hillside housing projects that I have been writing about here (cooperative building developments under the direct supervision of a world government) are designed from the ground up to provide rapid, yet permanent, modern and vastly improved accommodation for displaced victims. They can be built very quickly, complete with the best hospitals, schools and other of the most modern facilities already built in.


Of course, having a good design for infrastructure is not enough. These projects require a great deal of organization and trained workers prepared to respond at a moment's notice to every kind of emergency. A world emergency authority would train a large contingent of workers ready at any time to come in as soon as a place is declared a disaster area.


The emergency force should go far beyond the basic needs that are so much in need right now in Port au Prince, such as food, water, medical aid and shelter. They would lay in permanent housing while organizing the labour for recovery efforts. That way, as soon as immediate the immediate physical needs of victims are taken care of, teachers would move in to eliminate poverty and destitution by training large numbers of local people for the new tasks of an cosmopolitan economy. The new infrastructure would need new jobs, but crisis allows for the changes that would lead to a far more vital economy than existed before.


In Haiti the quake at first incapacitated by all reports, the government, police and other authorities, which led to looting and violence. If it were properly prepared, such conditions should actually make it easier for the world government to set up temporary replacements for local authorities and rapidly lay in hillside housing than if partial remnants of the pre-existing order remained.


There would be many aspects to such a finely tuned emergency response, but today I want to concentrate on one of the most important: corvee labour. The dictionary gives two definitions of corvee, both of which should kick in in an emergency. The first definition of corvee describes what would be set in motion as soon as the emergency hits.


Corvee, Definition One: "Unpaid labour (as toward constructing roads) due from a feudal vassal to his lord."


People naturally want to help others in a dire situation like an earthquake. However, when there are some who do not -- who may prefer to loot, for example, there are usually laws already in place to compel bystanders to assist in disaster relief, as long as there are enough police on the ground to enforce them. Of course, in the feudal age, corvee labour was far from voluntary, it was a non-monetary form of taxation. This leads to the second definition of corvee:


Corvee, Definition Two: "Labour exacted in lieu of taxes by public authorities especially for highway construction or repair."


As the first stage of disaster recovery fills the most urgent needs, a relief effort would then transition to a second stage aiming at corvee definition two. That is, journeyman tradespersons and teachers from around the world would move in to get the new hillside infrastructure operational and instruct locals in how to operate it. How do you do that? Give everybody the option to offer their expertise without excessive sacrifice, through corvee labour.


Thus, every worker, instead of paying taxes for this year in funds would have the choice to go to Port au Prince and work it off, directly applying their expertise in the recovery effort. In order to survive, they would live in a new hillside housing living pod, getting paid a nominal stipend and be fed by the new communal gardens and kitchens. Meanwhile of course, the nation they live in would lose the taxes they otherwise would have paid, but this loss can be written off as direct foreign aid.


Corvee labour would be a normal part of life in a hillside development, as it certainly was during the Roman Empire.


"Under the Roman Empire, certain classes of people owed personal services to the state or to private proprietors. For example, labor might be requisitioned for the maintenance of the postal systems of various regions, or landed proprietors might require tenant farmers and persons freed from slavery to perform unpaid labor on their estates. The feudal system of corvie -- regular work that vassals owed their lords  developed from this Roman tradition."


Clearly, this is not a new idea. No doubt in the past it was wrapped up in the cruel and inadequate social systems of the time, including slavery and serfdom.


However, if corvee were modernized I think that many, if not most workers would find it has tremendous advantages. It is far more interesting to take a few months a year off to go somewhere exotic to work or teach, in lieu of taxes, than to slog at the same old thing all the time and just deduct a proportion of its remuneration to taxes. In a new work situation, one would often discover new interests and skills. What is more, corvee could even solve unemployment by leading corvee workers into retraining for a new career.

Other workers might want to remain for an extended corvee work period and pay their tax bills several years ahead. This would give them several years of increased earning power, enabling them to accomplish in a few years financial goals that would otherwise take decades.


Corvee will undoubtedly be a useful tool to reduce dislocation from the expected rise in sea levels around the world caused by melting of the poles. Instead of huge influxes inland of helpless climate refugees, people living in coastal cities would simply serve corvee obligations in many different places, until they found an inland job that suited them.


I think that a corvee labour system could potentially supercharge the volunteer economy as well. Volunteers already play an important role in keeping the system going, and a well-designed corvee system might offer many the opportunity to know the joy of serving society without the usual considerations of narrow personal gain getting in the way.




::

Saturday, January 16, 2010

RMB Book Review

Freaky Externalities


Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, Super Freakonomics, Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance, Harper Collins Publishers, Toronto, 2009



One of the most stimulating books I have read in a long time is "Super Freakonomics," the sequel to Freakonomics, by Levitt and Dubner. This book actually has a solution to global warming, cooked up by Bill Gates and his braino buddies. Unfortunately, as the authors point out, there is no body with the authority to take on the responsibility of cooling off the poles in the simple, cheap way that they propose.


Gates' think tank has also come up with a way to prevent hurricanes, and a rather strange explanation of the economics of prostitution. The most interesting part of the book for a student of the Baha'i principles like me is their explanation of the term "externality." An externality is an outside factor that changes the rules of the game. It can be good or bad but in practice it usually is bad.


Their favorite example in this and their earlier book of a good externality is the LoJack anti-theft device for cars. This is unlike earlier gadgets for this purpose. For example, if you put a visible steering wheel anti-theft mechanism like the "the Bar," thieves see that your vehicle is harder to steal. So they walk on to the next car without such a device. A good for you translates into a negative externality for everybody else.


The LoJack is different. It is a hidden radio transmitter that a car owner activates it goes missing. It silently notifies the authorities exactly where it is. The GPS signal it emits leads police exactly to where it is, which in the case of a stolen car is usually being dismantled in a chop shop for its expensive parts. The police shut the chop shop down. Countermeasure have proven ineffective. For a while thieves thought of parking the stolen car in a parking lot for a few days until the heat blew over. Popo got smart too, held off until the car had moved to the chop shop, at which point they shut it down. As a result, thieves had a disincentive to steal any car at all, since any one of them might be LowJacked. The result is an overall good for all drivers. A positive externality.



"For every additional percentage point of cars that have LoJack in a given city, overall thefts fell by as much as 20 percent. Since a thief cannot tell which cars have LoJack, he is less willing to take a chance on any car. LoJack is relatively expensive, about $700, which means it isn't all that popular, installed in fewer than 2 percent of cars. Even so, those cars create a rare and wonderful thing -- a positive externality -- for all the drivers who are too cheap to buy LoJack, because it protects their cars too.


"That's right, not all externalities are negative. Good public schools create positive externalities because we all benefit from a society of well educated people. (They also drive up property values.) Fruit farmers and beekeepers create positive externalities for each other; the trees provide free pollen for the bees and the bees pollinate the fruit trees, also at no charge. That is why beekeepers and fruit farmers often set up shop next to each other." (Super Freakonomics, p. 175)



Now there are fewer thieves, fewer car theft operations. Of course, it is possible that car thieves have moved on to stealing other things, making this positive externality a negative one for other things. But the book ignores that.


When I read that I suddenly realized that religion is a positive externality. As Baha'u'llah says,



"Religion is verily the chief instrument for the establishment of order in the world and tranquility among its peoples." (Tablets 63-4)



If Baha'u'llah had a more academic frame of mind, He might have called religion the Most Great Positive Externality.

Not that this was unknown before Baha'u'llah came along. That is why the state does not tax religious property and donations. It is understood that there are great benefits to all from a religious mind-set on the part of as many people as possible.


It is in everybody interest for a religious group to live up to its high ideals. If a faith group walks the walk as well as talking the talk, crime is reduced, the suicide rate goes down, mortality is improved, the poor are supported, and on and on. Baha'u'llah also pointed out that it is a positive externality that parents everywhere can contribute to, and from which parents benefit.


"It is the bounden duty of parents to rear their children to be staunch in faith, the reason being that a child who removeth himself from the religion of God will not act in such a way as to win the good pleasure of his parents and his Lord. For every praiseworthy deed is born out of the light of religion, and lacking this supreme bestowal the child will not turn away from any evil, nor will he draw nigh unto any good." (Baha'u'llah, Tablet translated from the Persian, Compilation on Baha'i Education, UHJ Research Dept., Baha'i World Center, August 1976, in Compilation of Compilations, #563, vol. I, p. 248)


No matter what you may say about a specific doctrine, no matter how nonsensical and risible their beliefs may seem to outsiders, everybody benefits if their actions are pious and altruistic.


What turns religion from a positive to a negative externality is when faith groups start to fight with one another.


It is the same as a marketplace. Every shopper benefits from legitimate competition among stallholders. If one merchant wants to sell better food for a lower price, we are all happier. Indeed, the entire market benefits from excellence. It can even attract shoppers from competing suppliers, such as supermarkets and big box stores. There is a benefit from advertising too, in moderation. If one stallholder proclaims himself better than all others, even if he strays a little from the truth, we all still tend to benefit from such confidence.


However, if they start carrying it too far, everything changes. If one marketer poisons the food of a competitor, or maligns his merchandise, such extreme behaviour instantly nullifies all the good that competitiveness has done. It not only harms clients but also damages the entire membership of the market. Indeed, illegitimate competition taints the whole food services industry.

The same is true of religion. It is something to think about on World Religion Day, which happens tomorrow.



"Consider whether there exists anywhere in creation a principle mightier in every sense than religion, or whether any conceivable power is more pervasive than the various Divine Faiths, or whether any agency can bring about real love and fellowship and union among all peoples as can belief in an almighty and all-knowing God, or whether except for the laws of God there has been any evidence of an instrumentality for educating all mankind in every phase of righteousness.

"Those qualities which the philosophers attained when they had reached the very heights of their wisdom, those noble human attributes which characterized them at the peak of their perfection, would be exemplified by the believers as soon as they accepted the Faith."(Abdu'l-Baha, Secret of Divine Civilization, 83-84)



::

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

boss parables

World Governance and the Parables of the Boss



By John Taylor; 2010 Jan 13, Sharaf 13, 166 BE



We have seen in previous essays that John Amos Comenius based his whole plan for world government on one dictum promulgated by Jesus Christ in the Sermon on the Mount:


"Call no man on the earth your father, for one is your Father, he who is in heaven. Neither be called masters, for one is your master, the Christ. But he who is greatest among you will be your servant." (Matt 23:9-11, WEB)


If you had to build an entire world government on a single dictum, I cannot imagine a more appropriate one. How dangerous would a president of the world be if he sees himself as our humblest servant? Of course, if he did, he would probably be the first mortal in history not to be corrupted by power. As Lord Acton's saying goes, "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." (It is unsurprising that a lord should have noticed this!)


In fact, Comenius interpreted "call no man master" to mean that power should never be placed into the hands of a single individual. Otherwise, that individual would not be a servant, he or she would be a master. As a result all governments, and especially a world government, would look very different from what it does today. It would be so designed that there could never be anything like a president of the world in the first place.


Instead, Comenius designed a world government that does not allow power to concentrate, since, like the rain from heaven that falls upon the place beneath, everything is divided into many tiny drops.

First of all, power is distributed on the continental level, with continental parliaments carrying the brunt of the day-to-day burden of running the world. On the highest level would be the world government, which would never have a sitting president. Instead, this central body would be broken into three committees. 


One is concerned with peace, the political world government, the second is charged with enlightenment, the scientific and educational body, and the third deals with religion, spirituality, culture and the arts.

Each of these policy making committees is a separate institution, and may never meet either with another committee or a continental parliament. Each independently culls the best of expert opinion in its area of expertise and presents it for debate and ratification by the collective membership of the continental parliaments. What the continental parliaments agree upon is law everywhere in the world. In other words, this world government may never meet as a single entity. There can be no wheeling and dealing behind closed doors because power is so diffuse, yet open and accountable. As long as a majority of those involved are sincere and take "the greatest among you will be your servant" to heart, there is no reason that this should not be a highly effectual and efficient world governing body.


However, before I continue with world government, I want to talk more about the scriptural basis of this decentralizing imperative. This is not the only case where scriptural authority advocates keeping power out of the hands of individuals. I cannot cover all scripture today, so let me restrict myself to a few quotations from the Qur'an that not only sanction what was said in the Sermon on the Mount, they actually extend and fulfill it. Take this,


"God puts forth a Parable -- a man belonging to many partners at variance with each other, and a man belonging entirely to one master: are those two equal in comparison? Praise be to God! but most of them have no knowledge." (Qur'an 39:29, Yusuf Ali tr)


This is a common enough experience in poorly run institutions. Effective organizations are unambiguous in distributing tasks. In a sloppy one, a worker will be directed by one manager to do a job, until another boss comes along and tells him something different. He has no clear job description, the buck stops nowhere and the chain of command is chopped to bits. Without a single authority nobody is responsible for anything and nothing gets done. The result is stress and factionalism. The poor worker is bullied. Not only the Pointy Haired Boss but Dogbert and Catbert as well join in pushing the hapless Dilbert around.


What is most significant is this is Holy Writ clearly asking that we use human organization, or lack thereof, as a metaphor for the belief in God. Where there is no God, there is no clear, ultimate authority in our minds, and society is doomed to schizophrenia and dissipation.


The Qur'an not only offers a parable for leadership, it also offers one for the other side of the coin, what can only be called "followership." In fact, it offers a twin parable. The first part contrasts the difference between a slave leading a slave, a situation rather like Jesus's "the blind leading the blind," and a follower who has an independent mindset. Such a servant not only supports himself but society and his God as well. No service is incompatible with the others.


"God sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to God. But most of them understand not." (Qur'an 16:75, Yusuf)


We can be slaves to this world, in which case we are slaves of a slave, a mindless, fickle, self-contradictory boss. Or, we can become servants of God. A servant of God is no mindless consumer, rather a mature agent with a clear purpose.


Michael Crichton as a medical student observed this happening to members of the medical profession. They concentrated so hard on the technical aspects of their trade that they could not be well rounded human beings. They failed to understand basic cultural references of their patients. They recommended perfect cures that destroyed the lives of their patients. In other words, they were servants of science, not of God or human beings. Such doctors are dangerous because they are imbalanced, and ignorant of many essential aspects of being a human being. This Abdu'l-Baha compared to travel; a well travelled person is well rounded, and better able to stand independently before God.


"It is evident, therefore, that man is in need of divine education and inspiration, that the spirit and bounties of God are essential to his development. That is to say, the teachings of Christ and the Prophets are necessary for his education and guidance. Why? Because They are the divine Gardeners Who till the earth of human hearts and minds. They educate man, uproot the weeds, burn the thorns and remodel the waste places into gardens and orchards where fruitful trees grow. The wisdom and purpose of Their training is that man must pass from degree to degree of progressive unfoldment until perfection is attained. For instance, if a man should live his entire life in one city, he cannot gain a knowledge of the whole world. To become perfectly informed he must visit other cities, see the mountains and valleys, cross the rivers and traverse the plains. In other words, without progressive and universal education perfection will not be attained." (Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation, 295)


Just as one is more perfectly informed about the world by travel, the Manifestation of God informs us of what is most important about every aspect of existence, be it here or in eternity. The philosopher Haraclitus said the same thing,


"The wisest of all men, compared to a god, seems an ape in wisdom, in beauty, and in all else." (Heraclitus, fr. 83)


The second half of our parable from the Qur'an looks at another aspect of human servitude, organization and authority.


"God sets forth (another) Parable of two men: one of them dumb, with no power of any sort; a wearisome burden is he to his master; whichever way be directs him, he brings no good: is such a man equal with one who commands Justice, and is on a Straight Way? (Qur'an 16:75-76, Yusuf)


A servant of God, then, is subservient to the Deity, but he or she is the reverse of a slave in relation to the world. He or she commands justice and walks a straight path.


In regard to other servants, all are equal. If all submit to the single divine authority no need will be felt for tyrants, or even authority figures. Servants are repulsed by the very idea of a single individual ruling over other servants. The more people feel that way, the harder it will be for tyrants to get a foot in the door. And perhaps most importantly, God would oppose anybody who tries to lord it over or put down another servant.


"Do not slander a servant to his master, lest he curse you, and you be held guilty." (Prov 30:10, WEB)


I will comment more on this proverb in future.




::

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Baker's Early Years

More from the writings of Richard St.Barbe Baker


New Earth Charter


My Life My Trees



My Comments About Baker's Autobiography and his Earth Charter


Today I want to share some more material from the writings of the Baha'i environmentalist, Richard St. Barbe Baker (1889-1982). First I include the text of his earth charter -- written long before the UN was presented with the present proposed earth charter. Then I will share the first installment of the first chapter of his autobiography, "My Life, My Trees."


My Life, My Trees surely ranks way up there with Ben Franklin's autobiography as one of the best ever written. It will be especially historic if, as I think they should, a world government decides to follow through on Baker's proposed desert reclamation project, which would draft the world's armies into tree planters, turning the massive surface of earth's land mass that is now desert into fertile, productive land. I plan to cite here the first and the second chapter in their entirety, then with the rest of the book restrict my quotes only to what is of interest to Baha'is.


It is a pity that the editor and publisher of My Life My Trees was so avid to take Baker under his control and to deny the fact that Baker was a Baha'i. He tacks on at the start of the book an amusing, mildly distressing preface written by himself. He is clearly avid to deny Baker's faith as a Baha'i and to assert that he was an animist like himself. This is not helped by the fact that Baker's personality is infused with old-school British reserve. When I got the book in the mail I paged through, trying to find any reference to Baha'i but I could not. Only as I was carefully reading the whole book did the brief references start to pop out, and at least one requires a certain knowledge of the Faith in order to recognize it as a reference.


With this book project the editor and publisher seems like a bird taking Baker under his wing. If you find God in a forest, he assumes, you must be worshipping the god Pan. It would be nice if the Baha'is could do for My Life, My Trees what they did for E.G. Browne, that is, buy up the copyrights to his books and reissue the books with a Baha'i editor and publisher. After all, the UHJ has already called him the "illustrious" Baker, so this would be a good teaching project.


As for the New Earth Charter, Baha'is will recognize a glimmering of the Master's words in His first speech in the West, given in a church in London.


"This is a new cycle of human power. All the horizons of the world are luminous, and the world will become indeed as a garden and a paradise. It is the hour of unity of the sons of men and of the drawing together of all races and all classes. You are loosed from ancient superstitions which have kept men ignorant, destroying the foundation of true humanity." (Abdu'l-Baha, Abdu'l-Baha in London, p. 19)



==========


New Earth Charter



I Believe in the oneness of mankind and of all living things, and the interdependence of each and all.


I Believe that unless we play fair to the earth and practice the law of return, we cannot exist physically; unless we play fair to our neighbour, we cannot exist socially or internationally; unless we play fair to our better selves, we cannot live as individuals.


I believe in the development of a fuller understanding of the true relationship between all forms of life, in an endeavour to maintain a natural balance between mineral, vegetable, animal, and human life.


I believe that the blossoming desert foretold by the prophets of old is now being fulfilled by the steady reclamation of the Sahara. This should be the scientific answer to the world's dilemma for it will provide a one-world purpose unifying East and West.


I believe that the Lord's Prayer has been answered and that it is in the process of being fulfilled. We are entering a new era of human power and all horizons are becoming luminous for this coming together of the sons of men, and that the Earth will indeed become as a garden of paradise.


I Believe that this generation will either be the last to exist in any semblance of a civilized world, or it will be the first to have the vision, the bearing, and the greatness to say:


`I will have nothing to do with this destruction of life, I will play no part in this devastation of the land; I am destined to live and work for peace for I am morally responsible for the world of today and the generation of tomorrow.'


I Pray that I may be just to the Earth beneath my feet, to the neighbour by my side, and to the light that comes from above and within, that this wonderful world of ours may be a little more beautiful and happy for my having lived in it.

So may it be.



==========

My Life My Trees

==========


Chapter One: I Am Led Forth




Part I, early childhood



In sleep of helpless infancy

Trees were the arms that cradled me;

On Tree my daily food is spread,

Tree is my chair and Tree my bed.

-Teresa Hooley




I was born in the country in a house on a sunny hill on the fringe of a pine wood in the south of Hampshire. Beacon Hill it was called because just above the house there had been the old telegraph station with high wooden arms which signalled messages --in twelve minutes -- between the Admiralty in London and Portsmouth.


As soon as I could walk I used to sit in a sunny spot on the pine needles and listen to the soft sounds of the wind in their make-shift leaves. It was like music to me. When I was two I had my first little garden. The first things I grew were nasturtiums and soon after that with the help of my Nanny I scratched my name in the soil and sowed white mustard seed. A week later I was proud to spell out the letters of a green RICHARD.


At four with the help of an old sailor I rigged up a little flag pole made from a larch that grew in the wood. I was proud of my flag pole which I had barked and painted myself; it was the centre of the little garden. Each morning I hoisted a flag and each evening I took it down, carefully rolled it up and tied it correctly ready to hoist and 'break' the next day. At the entrance to my little garden I stuck two withies and made an arch just big enough to allow me to pass under it. In a month's time to my great delight they started to grow leaves. It was a great thrill, for until then I had not grown anything more ambitious than nasturtiums and mustard.


... On Saturday evenings instead of playing cricket, as a great treat I was allowed to help my father sow tree seeds in long narrow beds I had helped to make. As the little pine seedlings came up they wore a little 'cap' which they seemed to be raising in salute.

I was fascinated by the regiments of tiny seedlings and I protected, weeded and watered them. Their care was more important to me than any game.


At the age of four I used my father's tools and my first effort in carpentering was to make a soap box for my mother, used for many years in the scullery sink and afterwards for further years at the stables.


My forebears had originally lived in Kent, having been granted lands by Henry I, who married off one of his paramours to a young knight. For generations Sissinghurst Castle was the Baker home until it was commandeered and used as an internment camp for French prisoners of war, who eventually burnt it down. It was then that the family were scattered and my branch went to live at Cawston in Norfolk. The Bakers who came from Normandy frequently intermarried with the St. Barbes who came from Brittany. Generations of St. Barbes lived at Broadlands, Romsey, until it was sold to Lord Palmerson, in Victorian times.


... As a boy I was told of my great-grandfather, Rector of Botley, Hampshire, for fifty-two years, who was one of the old-fashioned type of sporting parson. He used to wear a pink coat under a black gown, and he encouraged sport of every kind. He thought nothing of riding the seventy miles to London for a luncheon engagement, returning the next day. In order to promote the noble art of self-defence, a barrel of home-brewed beer was rolled out of the rectory on a Sunday afternoon in support of the local champion who would challenge all comers from Portsmouth.


He was a good boxer himself, as two highwaymen discovered one evening when they tried to relieve him of the money he was carrying home for his servants' wages. It was two footpads to one old man and a dog, and the Rector was attacked from front and back. But he got the better of his assailants, and with the help of his dog he marched them to the Bargate at Southampton. Then he walked home to Botley, arriving at the rectory cool and unperturbed, though his white shirt-front was covered in blood!


A former Scholar and Fellow of Pembroke College, Cambridge, he had earlier exchanged his living at Cawston in Norfolk for the one at Botley. He drove the whole two hundred miles in the family coach, borrowing horses at various stages, until he reached his new rectory. Then the coach was left in a paddock, where it became family mansion for generations of free-ranging cocks and hens.


Great-grandfather Baker is buried in the family vault at the west end of Botley church. It is an ornate affair with a pointed pillar bearing the family coat of arms. The present Rector, the Reverend Duke Baker, told me that once when the Sunday School was leaving the church, one little fellow pointed to the vault and asked, "Is that where Jesus was buried?"


His eldest son, my great-uncle Richard, was a scholar too and coached his brothers for Cambridge. For a while he farmed the 800-acre glebe farm for his father, riding once a year to Norfolk to collect rent from tenants on the family estate. Then he decided upon a more adventurous life, so he went out to Ontario, Canada, where he cleared the bush and shot wild bear.


His nearest neighbour, George, lived seven miles away, and on Sunday afternoons it was Richard's custom to ride over to visit his friends. As a boy of ten, I used to find it thrilling to listen to letters read to me by my father, which he too had enjoyed as a ten-year-old. Long passages of these letters dealt with philosophical and religious questions, often in an introspective vein, but every now and then there would be a spicy bit about bears. It was then that I sat up and really took notice.


One incident stands out in my memory. George told Richard how one night he heard an alarming noise coming from the yard. Pulling a sheepskin coat over his nightshirt, he went out into the yard, and there was a big black bear struggling to lift his prize hog over the sty ... He had no rifle or gun with him, so he seized a spade and with one mighty blow laid the bear's skull open with the edge, killing it. It fell dead at his feet.


Dead at his feet! I kissed my mother and said good night to her and my father. Looking out from my bedroom window I could see my young trees in the moonlight. I searched in all directions, but there was not even a shadow that remotely resembled a bear. "I will go to Canada one day," I thought, "where I can kill bears with spades!"


Richard's brother was John Thomas Wright Baker, my grandfather. He went to Clare Hall (now Clare College) and, like his father, became a parson. He did duty at the Hampshire parishes of Botley, Durley, Sholing, and West End, where he lived in his own house with a large, tree-surrounded garden. Like Nelson's Admiral Collingwood, he would tuck acorns in the hedgerows along the fields of his parish. Seventy years afterwards many of the resulting fine oaks were felled to build the little rescue ships of the war.


He was a great walker -- it is recorded that he once walked forty-two miles before breakfast on a pint of beer -- and always undertook his pastoral visits on foot, except on Sundays when he was driven in a brougham. He was also a trained athlete and excelled at both high and long jump. Sometimes when my father and grandmother were driving in the chaise they would meet my grandfather returning from some visit. For fun, he would start running backwards in front of the fast-trotting pony and at every dozen strides or so would jump backwards over his walking-stick!


He had a reputation as an eloquent reader, and rich and poor would fill his churches to hear him bring to life the ancient characters of Scripture for their enlightenment and enchantment.


It seems that in his church views he was led towards evangelicalism by his forebear, that author of "The Penitential Psalm of David." He could not abide sacerdotalism and avoided using the word "altar" for the "Lord's Table", adhering strictly to the Church's rubrics. A life-long vegetarian, he considered the Lord's Supper a love-feast of bread and wine among His close followers, as he believed the Master had meant it to be.


His out-and-out evangelical attitude was frowned upon by his Bishop who wrote him a curt note on the subject. Being of a highly sensitive nature he was so deeply shocked by this unchristian reproof that the blood rushed to his head, and he dropped dead. He was buried in the graveyard near the west door of the church at West End, where later my grandmother was buried too.

My dear father, John Richard St. Barbe Baker, the only child, was fourteen at the time, and from then on his gentle mother, who had felt the blow most bitterly, became his responsibility. He devoted himself to her and to his woodlands, establishing forest nurseries, and training and employing a number of men.


He had been brought up to understand that the family money, which his aunt Sarah had the use of during her lifetime, would ensure his independence. At the time of her last illness he was spending his winter doing missionary work among the villagers of the mountains of Southern France. In response to a telegram, he returned just in time to be with the old lady and comfort her in death. When the will came to be read, however, it was found that (the) trustees had persuaded Aunt Sarah to leave most of the (fortune) to them.


My father asked his lawyer cousin's advice, and he took the view that it was God's will and therefore little (good would be done by bringing) the matter into chancery. The trustees, who were brothers and also bankers, retired on Aunt Sarah's money. The senior one bought a mansion in the country, furnished and equipped with servants.


On the very first morning after his arrival to take possession, the butler came in to draw the curtains. When there was no reply to his comment on the weather, he went over to the bed, where he found his new master, dead. He telegraphed the brother, who at once caught a train from London. He asked the guard to stop at a halt near his brother's mansion, so that he could take a short cut across the fields. As requested, the train stopped. Nobody alighted, so the guard walked along the train to find the younger brother dead in his seat.


My father agreed with his cousin that this looked like divine retribution, but the misdirected wealth still did not return to him, so he gave up all thought of living as a country gentleman and (turned) his hobby into his business. This was fortunate for me, for from earliest childhood I became intimate with trees in nurseries.


As a boy, my father had not followed the family tradition of going to Cambridge; he had instead a private tutor. At the age of seventeen he became interested in the Evangelical Revival of the eighties of the last century, and under the influence of Archbishop Trench's daughter devoted himself to God's work, volunteering to carry on when Miss Trench left the district. Though he was only eighteen he filled the village reading-room on Sunday afternoons and evenings. Later, he built a Mission Hall seating three hundred in his own garden. People from the surrounding villages came to this centre soon -- even missionaries from Africa and India.


It was about this time that my father proposed to the only daughter of the Squire. Charlotte Purrott had played the harmonium in her father's reading-room and enthusiastically helped Miss Trench and John Baker with the Mission services. It was she who had been Miss Agnes Weston's strong supporter when she founded her Mission to Seamen. Charlotte's father, who was the Vicar's Warden at West End, kept the best horses in that part of Hampshire and hunted with the Hursley and the New Forest Stag Hounds.


Although his daughter never hunted, he mounted her well. When my father asked her to marry him she said that, fond as she was of him, she could not possibly marry him as he would not be able to provide her with the kind of life she had been accustomed to enjoy. A few weeks later her father lost his money in the Devil's Dyke Railway Company. Charles Purrott had believed in the Australian claimant in the Tichborne case and, having promised his support, lost heavily when the case was not proved. He was perhaps forty years ahead of his time in this venture. The combination of these unfortunate investments cost him his house and property at West End. Servants went, horses went, and his beautiful house too. His daughter wrote to my father:


"Dear John,

My father has lost all his money. Please marry me."


And he did.


I was fortunate in having a charming grandmother who used to take me for walks to visit her old neighbours. Those were the days of polite calls and daintily served tea in china cups. One Tuesday afternoon when we were calling upon her nearest neighbour, Mrs. Anderson, we found her distressed because she had lost a little tabby kitten. My grandmother mentioned that on Sunday evening a little stray kitten had come to the house. It had probably followed one of the maids to the Mission Hall. I had befriended it and it had settled down and become one of the family. I was terribly afraid that I might have to give up my kitten to which I had become very attached. Happily Mrs. Anderson sensed my anxiety and asked me, "Do you love my little kitten very much?" I answered that I did and so she generously said I might keep it. That was the first and last call that afternoon. I hastened home to make sure that my kitten was safe.


I was now four. My father was adding a couple of rooms to his house and I spent much time with the carpenters. Having seen a funeral procession the week before, when my father had put on his frock coat and a black silk hat, I was taken with the notion that if my pussy were to die I must give her a proper funeral with a coffin. I made a box two feet long from ends of flooring -- even at that early age I could use tools with precision and drive nails. I fitted a lid with leather hinges and tarred it inside and out, plastering myself at the same time. I remember my nanny making me rub butter on my hands to remove the black sticky stuff before finally scrubbing my hands with soap and water. The kitten's coffin was put into the roof of the shed where it stayed until the cowman broke a leg off the milk stool. Then my black box served him instead for many years. My kitten lived to be thirteen and in the end walked off into the wood. I always thought she had a secret burial place, but search as I might I never found it.


When I was five my father said, "You are getting a big boy now. This will make you strong," and he cut a slice of meat from the servants' joint. Although he was practically vegetarian himself, he provided a weekly joint for the cook and the housemaids.


"Father, I don't need it," I protested, and soon ate up the vegetables and baked potato.


"But Daddy says you must eat ittake it to your room and do not come down till it's gone!"


It was a beautiful Saturday and it seemed unfair that I should be punished in this way. Every now and again my father would call up the stairs,


"My boy! Has that meat gone?"


"No, father," I would have to admit.


I looked out across the lawn to my seed beds where whole regiments of little trees were awaiting my attention, and as my eyes ranged nearer I saw my kitten on the lawn just under my window. In a loud whisper I called, "Kitty," and threw out that horrid slice of beef. She snapped it up. A great fear came over me. I crouched on the floor beside my bed in the corner waiting in terror of what might happen next. After a seemingly interminable time, the voice came again:


"My boy! Has that meat gone?"


"Y-y-y-e-s, Father," I called back tremblingly.


"Good boy. You may come down."


I escaped to my little trees and a hot tear dropped into the watering can, for I had deceived my father whom I loved. I never had the courage to own up to what I had done. He had been obeyed, at least so he thought, and that was what mattered to him. He never tried to make me eat meat again and I proved for myself that it was not necessary as a food. My health was good. I was strong, and as I grew up I could walk or ride long distances.



::

Monday, January 11, 2010

Sin and illness, a tie?

We had a Sunday board game night last night, all four of us sitting around the kitchen table playing a Star Wars Monopoly game.


The kids enjoyed it tremendously, the adults less so. I kept being sent to jail, do not pass go, do not collect two hundred, well, whatever the currency is in the Star Wars universe.


I glanced over at my library and picked up a volume I purchased a few years ago but which, like most of the books there, I had not cracked. Out popped an undiscovered chocolate Easter egg, a good omen to be sure.


The book was Michael Crichton's "Travels," which proved to be light fare with enough substance to make it enticing.


I bowed out of the game and have not been able to put it down since.


One essay, Heart Attack!, I found especially intriguing, and I want to include it today, since I do not have an essay.


I am working hard on the fourth draft of my book-in-progress, People Without Borders.


So, without further ado,

 

 

Heart Attack! (from Michael Crichton, Travels, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1988, pp. 55-60)

 

 

A major disaster befell the medical wards of the Beth Israel Hospital. All the interns and residents went around shaking their heads. The disaster was that, by some quirk of fate or statistics, two-thirds of the patients on the ward had the same illness. Heart attack.

 

The residents acted as if all the theaters in town were playing the same movie, and they'd seen it. Furthermore, most of these patients would be here for two weeks, so the movie wasn't going to change soon. The home staff was gloomy and bored, because, from a medical standpoint, heart attacks aren't terribly interesting. They are dangerous and life-threatening, and you worry about your patients, because they may die suddenly. But the diagnostic procedures were well worked out, and there were clear methods for following the progress of recovery.


By now I was in my final year of medical school, and I had decided I would quit at the end of the year. So my three months at the Beth Israel were going to be all the internal medicine I would ever learn; I had to make the best of this time.

 

I decided to learn something about the feelings the patients had about their disease. Because, although doctors were bored by myocardial infarcts, the patients certainly weren't. The patients were mostly men in their forties and fifties, and the meaning of this illness was clear to them—they were getting older; this was a reminder of their impending mortality; and they would have to change their lives: work habits, diets, perhaps even their pattern of sexual relations.

 

So there was plenty of interest for me in these patients. But how to

approach them?

 

Some time earlier, I had read about the experiences of a Swiss physician who, in the 1930s, had taken a medical post in the Alps because it allowed him to ski, which was his great passion. Naturally, this doctor ended up treating many skiing accidents. The cause of the accidents interested him, since he was himself a skier. He asked his patients why they had had their accidents, expecting to hear that they had taken a turn too quickly, or hit a patch of rock, or some other skiing explanation. To his surprise, everyone gave a psychological reason for the accident. They were upset about something, they were distracted, and so on. This doctor learned that the bald question "Why did you break your leg?" yielded interesting answers.


So I decided to try that. I went around and asked patients, "Why did you have a heart attack?"

 

From a medical standpoint, the question was not so nonsensical as it sounded. During the Korean War, post-mortems on young men had shown that the American diet produced advanced arteriosclerosis by the age of seventeen. You had to assume that all these patients had been walking around with severely clogged arteries since they were teenagers. A heart attack could happen any time. Why had they waited twenty or thirty years to develop a heart attack? Why had their heart attack happened this year and not next, this week and not last week?

But my question "Why did you have a heart attack?" also implied that the patients had some choice in the matter, and therefore some control over their disease. I feared they might respond with anger. So I started with the most easygoing patient on the ward, a man in his forties who had had a mild attack.

 

"Why did you have a heart attack?"

"You really want to know?"

"Yes, I do."

"I got a promotion. The company wants me to move to Cincinnati. But my wife doesn't want to go. She has all her family here in Boston, and she doesn't want to go with me. That's why."

He reported this in a completely straightforward manner, without a trace of anger. Encouraged, I asked other patients.

"My wife is talking about leaving me."

"My daughter wants to marry a Negro man."

"My son won't go to law school."

"I didn't gel the raise."

"I want to get a divorce and feel guilty."

"My wife wants another baby and I don't think we can afford it."

No one was ever angry that I had asked the question. On the contrary, most nodded and said, "You know, I've been thinking about that. . . ."

 

And no one ever mentioned the standard medical causes of arteriosclerosis, such as smoking or diet or getting too little exercise.

 

Now, I hesitated to jump to conclusions. I knew all patients tended to review their lives when they got really sick, and to draw some conclusion about why the illness had happened. Sometimes the explanations seemed pretty irrelevant. I'd seen a cancer patient who blamed her disease on a lifelong fondness for Boston cream pie, and an arthritis patient who blamed his mother-in-law.


On the other hand, it was accepted in a vague way that there was a relationship between mental processes and disease. One clue came from timing of certain illnesses. For example, the traditional season for duodenal ulcers was mid-January, just after the Christmas holidays. No one knew why this should be, but a psychological factor in the timing of the disease seemed likely.

 

Another clue came from the association of some physical illnesses with a characteristic personality. For example, a significant percentage of patients with ulcerative bowel disease had extremely irritating personalities. Since the disease itself was hard to live with, some doctors wondered if the disease caused the personality. But many suspected that it was the other way around: the personality caused the disease. Or at least whatever caused the bowel disease also caused the personality.

 

Third, there was a small group of physical diseases that could be successfully treated with psychotherapy. Warts, goiter, and parathyroid disease responded to both surgery and psychotherapy, suggesting that these illnesses might have direct mental causes.

And, finally, it was everybody's ordinary experience that the minor illnesses in our own lives—colds, sore throats—occurred at times of stress, times when we felt generally weak. This suggested that the ability of the body to resist infection varied with mental attitude.

 

All this information interested me enormously, but it was pretty fringe stuff in the 1960's in Boston. Curious, yes. Worthy of note, yes. But nothing to pursue in a serious way. The great march of medicine was headed in another direction entirely.

 

Now, I was getting these data from the heart attack patients. And what I was seeing was that their explanations made sense from the standpoint of file whole organism, as ;I kind of physical acting-out. These patients were telling me stories of events that had affected their hearts in a metaphorical sense. They were telling me love stories. Sad love stories, which livid pained their hearts. Their wives and families and bosses didn't care for them. Their hearts were attacked.

 

And pretty soon their hearts were literally attacked. And they experienced physical pain. And that pain, that attack, was going to force a change in their lives, and the lives of those around them. These were men in late middle life, all undergoing a transformation that was signalled by this illness event.

It made almost too much sense.

 

Finally I brought it up with Herman Gardner. Dr. Gardner was then chief of medicine at the hospital, and a remarkable, extremely thoughtful man. As it happened, he was the attending physician who made rounds with us each day. I said to him that I had been talking with the patients, and I told him their stories.

 

He listened carefully.

 

"Yes," he said. "You know, once I was admitted to the hospital for a slipped disc, and sitting in bed I began to wonder why this had happened to me. And I realized that I had a paper from a colleague that I had to reject, and I didn't want to face up to it. To postpone it, I got a slipped disc. At the time, I thought it was as good an explanation as any for what had happened to me."

 

Here was the chief of medicine himself reporting the same kind of experience. And it opened up all sorts of possibilities. Were psychological factors more important than we were acknowledging? Was it even possible that psychological factors were the most important causes of disease? If so, how far could you push that idea? Could you consider myocardial infarctions to be a brain disease? How would medicine be different if we considered all these people, in all these beds, to be manifesting mental processes through their physical bodies?

Because at the moment we were treating their physical bodies. We acted as if the heart was sick and the brain had nothing to do with it. We treated the heart. Were all these people being treated for the wrong organs?

 

Such errors were known. For example, some patients with severe abdominal pain actually had glaucoma, a disease of the eye. If you operated on their abdomens, you didn't cure the disease. But if you treated their eyes, the abdominal pains disappeared.

 

But to extend that idea more broadly to the brain suggested something quite alarming. It suggested a new conception of medicine, a whole new view of patients and disease.

 

To take the simplest example, we all believed implicitly the germ theory of disease. Pasteur proposed it one hundred years before, and it had stood the test of time. There were germs—micro-organisms, viruses, parasites—that got into the body and caused infectious disease. That was how it worked.

 

We all knew that you were more likely to get infected at some times than others, but the basic cause and effect—germs caused disease—was not questioned. To suggest that germs were always out there, a constant factor iii environment, and that the disease process therefore reflected our mental state, was to say something else.

 

It was to say mental states caused disease.

 

And if you accepted that concept for infectious disease, where did you draw the line? Did mental states also cause cancer? Did mental states cause Heart attacks? Did mental states cause arthritis? What about diseases of old age? Did mental states cause Alzheimer's? What about children? Did mental states cause leukemia in young children? What about birth defects? Did mental states cause mongolism at birth? If so, whose mental state—the mother's or the child's? Or both?

 

It became clear that at the farther reaches of this idea, you came uncomfortably close to medieval notions that a pregnant woman who suffered a fright would later produce a deformed child. And any consideration of mental states automatically raised the idea of blame. If you caused your illness, weren't you also to blame? Much medical attention had been devoted to removing ideas of blame from disease. Only a few illnesses, such as alcoholism and other addictions, still had notions of blame attached.

 

So this idea that mental processes caused disease seemed to have retrogressive aspects. No wonder doctors hesitated to pursue it. I myself backed away from it for many years.

 

It was Dr. Gardner's view that both the physical and the mental aspects were important. Even if you imagined the heart attack had a psychological origin, once the cardiac muscle was damaged it needed to be treated as a physical injury. Thus the medical care we were giving was appropriate.

 

I wasn't so sure about this. Because, if you imagined that the mental process had injured the heart attack, then couldn't the mental process also Kcal the heart? Shouldn't we be encouraging people to invoke their inner resources to deal with the injury? We certainly weren't doing that. We were doing the opposite: we were constantly telling people to lie down, Io take it easy, to give over their treatment to us. We were reinforcing the idea that they were helpless and weak, that there was nothing they could do, and they'd better be careful even going to the bathroom because the least strain and—poof!—you were dead. That was how weak you were.

 

This didn't seem like a good instruction from an authority figure to a patient's unconscious mental process. It seemed as if we might actually be delaying the cure by our behavior. But, on the other hand, some patients who refused to listen to their doctors, who jumped out of bed, would die suddenly while having a bowel movement. And who wanted to take responsibility for that?


Many years passed, and I had long since left medicine, before I arrived at a view of disease that seemed to make sense to me. The view is this:


We cause our diseases. We are directly responsible for any illness that happens to us.

 

In some cases, we understand this perfectly well. We knew we should have not gotten run-down and caught a cold. In the case of more catastrophic illnesses, the mechanism is not so clear to us. But whether we can see a mechanism or not—whether there is a mechanism or not—it is healthier to assume responsibility for our lives, and for everything that happens to us.

 

Of course it isn't helpful to blame ourselves for an illness. That much is clear. (It's rarely helpful to blame anybody for anything.) But that doesn't mean we should abdicate all responsibility as well. To give up responsibility for our lives is not healthy.

 

In other words, given the choice of saying to ourselves, "I am sick but it has nothing to do with me," or saying, "I am sick because I caused the sickness," we are better off thinking and behaving as if we did it to ourselves. I believe we are more likely to recover if we take that responsibility.

 

For one thing, when we take responsibility for a situation, we also take control of it. We are less frightened and more practical. We are better able to focus on what we can do now to ameliorate the illness, and to assist healing.

 

We also keep the true role of the doctor in better perspective. The doctor is not a miracle worker who can magically save us but, rather, an expert adviser who can assist us in our own recovery. We are better off when we keep that distinction clear.

 

When I get sick, I go to my doctor like everyone else. A doctor has powerful tools that may help me. Or those tools may hurt me, make me worse. I have to decide. It's my life. It's my responsibility.



::

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Droopy Souls

Soul as Time Lord



What makes humans any better than animals?


Every time the issue comes up at a meeting, my daughter asks the same question: Why do animals not have souls? She asked the question once more at a recent seminar we attended on the nature of the soul. The speaker handed her the usual arguments, the same thing she has heard and rejected a thousand times before. As I looked on I felt a mix of boredom and dismay. Then for a while, I zoned out. They began discussing other things. Suddenly the answer to her question hit me. Of course! Why did I never think of this before? What is one thing that makes humans so smart? What makes us superior?


Time!


It is so simple. Humans reach a whole new level because we can put time in our pocket. Superior intelligence does not consist of the usual suspects, opposing thumbs, tool making, language, money, abstract thinking... No. These are part of the answer, but they each on its own does not explain what the soul is or why our mental powers can take us to a whole new level. The real explanation is that they give us access to an entire new dimension, time. They not only let us in on this dimension, they give us control over it as well.


Like animals, our senses let us plug into all three perceptible physical dimensions: width, depth and height. Animals do this too. This is necessary, since the power of locomotion requires sensory perception, if only to avoid collisions. Animals have a grasp of the first three dimensions that every bit as good as ours, sometimes better.


Nor is it that animals have absolutely no sense of time. The difference is that they perforce live in the present, the here and now. They do plan a little way into the future. And undoubtedly, they can remember what happened to them in the past. But, temporally speaking, there is no meeting of animal minds in this dimension. Animals are always individuals living here and now. No matter how hard they may try, they cannot meet in the dimension of time.

True, animals are endowed with the mysterious power of instinct, which gives them brief, limited access to what to do. Instinct comes from some longer sense of evolutionary time. But it is a simulacrum, not a power or a meeting ground. Instinct is conditioned by time and circumstance, it does not rule or transcend time. Even ants and bees, cooperative as they are, can only see and make decisions as individuals.


But all distinctive human powers plug directly into time, and use it actively. Our reasoning powers make time our stepping stone, not a brick wall. Our powers of language and abstraction let us move around in and interact with past and future, not only as individuals but as a collectivity. Reason, magnified by language, gives a vision of the entire human race, past and future, and in turn, this vision conditions who we become as individuals. This is where the first two principles, search and oneness, come together as the confluence of two great rivers.


With this transcendent grasp, we connect past to the present, and the future to the present. Our miraculous power of imagination is magnified in our virtual time machine -- for language, especially written language, is a time machine. Books and information technology take us around the world in an instant; they give a peek into the brightest insights of the best minds in history. Our imagination flies us through past and future and connects the two, giving us the ability to invent new plans for a better life. The plan lets us construct a different future than what our background and environment would otherwise dictate. Thus the soul is a divine thing in that it is a temporal reality, a link to the Beginning that has no beginning, and the End beyond ends.


Out of time comes free will, a choice between good and evil, or to speak more exactly, a choice between planning and drifting, between active rational activity and letting the whim of the moment predominate. This is termed the fall of man. The Qur'an uses the word "Kharra," falling or drooping, for human refusal to plan a new future. It says,


"Those who, when they are admonished with the Signs of their Lord, droop (kharra) not down at them as if they were deaf or blind." (Q25:73, tr. Yusuf)

Kharra means to "fall down, to snore, droop down as if bored or inattentive," as if a listener does not want to hear." This is the meaning of the fall of man, a falling away of the soul from a covenant with a Creator who wants to lead us into active relationship with time. We are time lords, and if we renounce this lordship, we renounce not only time but the other dimensions as well; since Einstein we have known that time and space are a single entity.

Given all that, I woke this morning with an addendum to this idea that the soul is lordship over time.


I awoke with the thought that we must expunge all commercialism and broadcast advertising, not for the usual reasons but because it blocks the soul. The whole capitalist system is specifically designed to divide and conquer, to break our time lordship up into tiny, impotent particles.


I thought of the dozens of people I have met and entered into what passes for deep discussion during the past five years in our Socrates Cafe meeting. Every one of them is what you would expect to find if you encountered a character out of the novel 1984. Everything they say, it is "Big Brother this, Big Brother that." Even if these poor souls were freed forever from the oppressive society depicted in that novel, they will still have Big Brother on their tongues. He will be looking over their shoulder until the day they die.


That is what we are like in this consumer society.


Even when we are not looking at ads, they are looking at us. They look right into our soul. We are utterly, deeply cowed by advertising. Whenever we are called to say something, to think for ourselves, to make a plan to change our world, our first thought is: what will the advertisers think? What can be done without them? What can we possibly do against this current. Is it conceivable to ever oppose what the huge waves of commercials tell the world?


I lay in bed thinking: what is the message of commercials? What is the message behind all the ostensive messages in the flood of advertising conditioning our mental world? It is this:


"In a capitalist system thoughts, opinions, ideas are all votes. And these votes are not free. If you have money, you can vote. If you do not already have money, a lot of money to spend on advertising, forget about voting. You are free to think, but forget about acting. Your thoughts cannot vote in plans. You are utterly without power. I your friendly advertiser have just bought a space in your head. I have sucked away your time, your thoughts, your limited time, and inserted what I think right there. Think about what that means. If I can buy a piece of your brain, if I can buy out your access to time, what power do you have? You are no time lord. You have no soul. I am your time lord. You are a mere animal. You are my puppet. I am your God. Droop, fall. I paid for this, so submit."


Healthy souls may take a message like that a few times a day and resist successfully but we permit ourselves to be flooded, inundated by thousands, millions of ads with this same underlying message tacked onto them every minute, every hour of the day.



"These few brief days shall pass away, this present life shall vanish from our sight; the roses of this world shall be fresh and fair no more, the garden of this earth's triumphs and delights shall droop and fade. The spring season of life shall turn into the autumn of death, the bright joy of palace halls give way to moonless dark within the tomb. And therefore is none of this worth loving at all, and to this the wise will not anchor his heart.


"He who hath knowledge and power will rather seek out the glory of heaven, and spiritual distinction, and the life that dieth not. And such a one longeth to approach the sacred Threshold of God; for in the tavern of this swiftly-passing world the man of God will not lie drunken, nor will he even for a moment take his ease, nor stain himself with any fondness for this earthly life." (Abdu'l-Baha, Selections, 220-221)



::

Saturday, January 09, 2010

Baker and Reclamation

Baker and the Sahara

 

 

By John Taylor; 2010 Jan 09, Sharaf 09, 166 BE

 

 

 

==========

 

 

More on the Challenge of the Sahara

 

 

Richard St.Barbe Baker as a Baha'i

 

 

==========

 

 

 

Challenge of the Sahara

 

 

 

In his writings, St. Augustine, who lived in the time of the late Roman Empire quoted a traditional saying: "There is always something new coming out of Africa." You would think that such an ancient observation about the oldest continent would have played itself out by now, but such is not the case. Science magazines have reported over the past few weeks that Africans have discovered and added to their diets a good half-dozen domesticated nuts and fruits from trees previously unknown to agriculture. ("Cinderella fruit: Wild delicacies become cash crops," http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427331.200-cinderella-fruit-wild-delicacies-become-cash-crops.html; New exotic fruit to hit UK shops,http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7506997.stm) This news was especially gratifying to hear as I was reading Richard St. Barbe Baker's Sahara Challenge, the story of a trip across the world's largest desert told by a renowned expert on trees. He explains that the first word for "paradise" or "heaven," was garden, meaning a clearing in the forest where our ancestors grew vegetables, fruits and nuts. To be successful and happy, we have to surround everything with trees, especially our food sources. Trees suck up water from underground, most of which it leaves in the earth around it. In other words, the only antidote to desertification is more and better trees. And it is so wonderful that this continent is still giving us new things, farmers are still discovering new domesticable trees in Africa!

 

 

At the beginning of Sahara Challenge, Baker describes what a desert is, a definition that I had never heard, even after all the training I got in High School geography classes. All a desert is is land that has lost its trees. Wind and rain erosion take over as high areas lose their soil and the rocks are exposed. Then the bits of rock that are eroded away fill in the low areas. Soon they are filled with all these little bits broken off, otherwise known as sand. One thing that you get a lot of in lower elevations in deserts is sand. Lots of it. What do you do with it all?

 

 

Baker at the start of his trip goes through France, which he finds has the best desert reclamation program he saw anywhere on the expedition. It seems that the Les Landes region is a desert that was being carefully reclaimed by a systematic planting program of selected grasses and trees. No doubt, if France had the same ignorance and lack of direction that governments in North Africa had, it too would be mostly desert by now. Baker notices one major cause of the spread of the Sahara: the goat. A memorable picture in the book shows goats climbing all through the branches of a forlorn desert tree eating every branch and twig on it. If the goats were not such an engrained part of the culture and economy of desert peoples, there probably would not be a Sahara desert. In other words, a people that depends upon goats for sustenance soon becomes a desert culture, whether they plan it or not.

 

 

A recent TED talk (http://www.ted.com/talks/magnus_larsson_turning_dunes_into_architecture.html) describes another innovation being tried out in the Sahara, though it does come from high technology research done by some Western university. I think it may prove to be highly significant for desert reclamation. What they do is take a computer CAD-CAM program and design a structure that they want build out of a sand dune. Any shape you want, you just type it in. Then they dump a special breed of bacteria onto the sand dune. The bacteria go down and solidify exactly the shape you specified, then they die out. The sand becomes sandstone. You take an industrial equivalent to a leaf blower or water hose and blow away all the extraneous sand and you have a building or protective structure where you can either live or plant trees.

 

 

This is exactly what I had in mind for the hillside or mound construction proposed in my book-in-progress, "People without Borders." This is what you do as soon as a world parliament is founded: you take giant mound making machines based on the bacterial construction technique that I just described. You take a percentage of the personnel in every military organization in the world, say half or three quarters of them, and send them off into the Sahara and other deserts and let them build these structures and plant trees. Once mounds and tree corridors crisscross the desert, then you are well on the way to complete reclamation. As Baker points out, populating the Sahara alone is the equivalent of discovering an entire new continent. Add on the other deserts and you have a land area equivalent in size to North and South America.

 

 

Imagine the effect on history if Europe had not discovered the Americas! Imagine if these two continents just sank into the sea, what a loss that would be for civilization. Okay, there might be some gains, but mostly it would be a loss. And this is exactly what we are doing by neglecting Baker's call to repopulate the world's deserts (actually he was not the first, as he points out in the book; there were proposals dating back several centuries). Since Baker's death in the 1980's, the world is being forced by inexorable global warming to lose a similar massive amount of good land on coastlines around the world. I do not know if it is the equivalent of a continent, but it must be close. And still, with all this pressure, we go on with business as usual and utterly neglect his call to reclaim the deserts!

 

 

Anyway, once you have the armies of the world hard at work reclaiming the deserts, you suddenly have a market for all that sand. These former soldiers will learn there how to build structures with sandstone-making bacteria and how to organize and live in the hillside mounds made out of the sandstone products. Then these new experts will be in demand for making similar structures around the world.

 

 

At that point we can start building the World Belt, a transportation and power grid including a strip of hillside housing encircling the world. The world parliament will see that this belt is laid from the tip of South Africa to the Middle East, across Asia, to Australia, Europe, and over the Baron Straits right through to the tip of South America. This belt will unite the world in at least three ways: a rapid train, a superconducting power grid supplied by intermittent solar panels and wind turbines, and by the strip of high density, no-environmental impact housing.

 

 

The result?

 

 

As soon as we have established our desert foothold, suddenly there will be a huge export market for sand. Sand will be the most valuable building material pretty much everywhere around the world. Then the residents of the newly tamed Sahara will have a high value commodity to export everywhere else, and TGV trains to export them cheaply. As each city and town on the planet is connected by the world belt, and as people in older constructions start to demand the advantages that hillside housing offers, then the huge demand for sandstone will rapidly eat up the excess sands that keep so much low lying desert land infertile and unusable.

 

If that happens, the saying that there is always something new coming out of Africa will continue to be the case. Imagine if these new fruits and nuts were planted across the Sahara. Suddenly it would become the world's breadbasket for new and more nutritious food items.

 

 

 

Notes on Richard St.Barbe Baker as a Baha'i

 

 

 

In 1990 the UHJ wrote:

 

 

"Just as the (Baha'i) community has extended its ramifications internally, it has also expanded its relations, influence and appeal externally in a variety of ways, some astonishing in their breadth and potential. A few examples will suffice: Through the newly established Office of the Environment, the Baha'i International Community, on its own initiative and in collaboration with other environmental organizations, re-instituted the annual World Forestry Charter Gathering founded in 1945 by the renowned Richard St. Barbe Baker; since then the Office of the Environment has been invited to participate in important events sponsored by international organizations concerned with environmental questions..." (The Universal House of Justice, Ridvan Message, 147, 1990, p. 2)

 

 

 

This biographical note is included in Shoghi Effendi, The Unfolding Destiny of the British Baha'i Community, p. 474-475

 

RICHARD ST. BARBE BAKER, O.B.E., LL.D.,

 

 

 

"On his return from Kenya in 1924 where he had served as Assistant Conservator of Forests since 1920, R. St. Barbe Baker was asked to speak on the faiths of the Kikuyu under the title: "Some African Beliefs" at the 'Conference of Living Religions within the Empire', and was approached afterwards by Claudia Stewart-Coles who exclaimed "You are a Baha'i".

 

 

"He subsequently accepted the Faith and has introduced it to many thousands of people in all walks of life in many lands, for more than half a century. The Guardian became the first Life Member of the Men of the Trees in Palestine in 1929. Later, for twelve consecutive years, he sent an official message to St. Barbe's World Forestry Charter Gatherings attended by Ambassadors from up to sixty-two countries each year.

 

 

"St. Barbe took an active part on the Committee celebrating the Centenary of the Declaration of the Bab in 1944. After his first Sahara University Expedition carrying out an ecological survey of 9,000 miles in 1953, and in response to the Guardian's desire, St. Barbe attended the First African Conference in Kampala. In 1975 St. Barbe was called upon to advise on tree planting of the site of the Tihran House of Worship in consultation with Quinlan Terry, architect.

 

 

"Afterwards, in collaboration with architect Hossein Amanat, he recorded his observations for the Universal House of Justice for the landscaping of their site on Mt. Carmel and for tree-scaping at Bahji. St. Barbe attended the Intercontinental Conference Nairobi, in October 1976 and still (1979) at almost 90 is introducing or teaching the Faith in many lands and would be content to `lay down his bones in service to the Faith' in his beloved Africa."::