By
Today is my fiftieth birthday, and I am spending it doing the one thing I love most, getting on topic and then getting off it. First off, for those in the area,
We just got back from a Thanksgiving weekend stay at
On Friday we pulled the kids out of school at lunchtime and hit the road early. First we drove to
I had volunteered to give a presentation on the Master's visit to
Afterwards I answered questions, which were about the relations of Baha'is with the Esperanto movement. This experience, one of the few teaching experiences I have had in years, persuaded me that I should do more to till this fertile and neglected ground between Baha'i and Esperanto. During the talk I promised to finish the illustrated talk of the Master narrated by Silvie that I had originally conceived and to come back and present it at next year's ARE.
In the afternoon we hiked up a mountain, stopping periodically for Normando, who along with his wife Zdratka Fleury is the chief organizer of everything to do with ARE, to explain facts, names and details about the trees surrounding us. As a botanist at
Another leaf Normando pointed out was from the hemlock tree. Somebody suggested that these leaves can be made into a tea. Normando is very French and gave his characteristic Pierre Trudeau shrug of the shoulders and "I do not know" movement of the hands. I objected, "Hey, didn't ingesting hemlock kill Socrates?" No, no, that is an herb of an entirely different species that has the same name. The tree is not poisonous. As the incline got steeper I found myself coming up with more botanical questions for Normando as an excuse to stop and catch my breath.
We made the summit with panorama, and looked down at the YMCA camp with Silver lake in the background. Then on the way down I was spontaneously interviewed by Zdratka about the details of my life. She explained that one should take a serpentine path down a steep slope in order to save the knees from too much stress. I found out later that she was raised in a mountainous area of
At one point there was an oratory contest, a two to three minute speech, all of which were judged and the three best speakers given a prize. Silvie started it off with an explanation of her favorite thing in the whole world, the Silverwing series of novels. She was the only speaker who did not even reach the two minute warning. The winner was a tall, professorly-looking, bearded fellow called Francesco, who spoke of his love of learning a new language. For him learning a language is like entering a world, like being introduced to a new universe complete in itself. He spoke with the fervor that I imagine a sex addict might describe seducing a new lover. For him a new languages gives an authentic, incomparable taste of the history and collective experience of an entire culture. Fortunately Silvie was not present for the award presentation; she was off playing with Tomaso, her little brother, in one of the many play structures available on this campus. She never takes losing with anything like equanimity. But they did offer her a beginner's prize, three small booklets.
That evening we had a "kultura vespero" with presentations, music, games and other spontaneous activities contributed by those present. For that evening Silvie had a theatrical premier to offer. She wrote during the day just for that occasion a brief scene from a dramatic incident that takes place early in her Silverwing novel. She drafted Mom, Dad and little brother to play roles in it. All the family is a stage and all the people merely players. I played the only role I excel at, the bad guy, in this case an owl who wanted to kill Shade, the bat hero of the story, who had violated an ancient treaty agreement by staying outside long enough to glimpse the sun. The skit was actually about the filming of a live action version of the story and had two parts, the first of a scene where the actors mess up, the second part being when they get it right. It featured her usual sense of humor and might, with good actors, have had impact. But our messing up of the mess-up was not without inadvertent humor too.
At one point I got into an argument with an all-American fellow, call him Righty, who opined that the
For him, all Muslims are evil, hell-bent on erasing
I was amazed that any intelligent person could dress up bigotry in indisputable facts the way Righty did. I had read that such people are common in the
I mentioned Noam Chomsky and learned that he is a traitor. I asked if Righty was a Republican and everybody was shocked. A Republican would never come near Esperanto. Which, I suppose, would place Righty towards the leftward end of the American political spectrum, if you can call such a monochrome display a "spectrum." The only way to get peace in the world, according to Righty, would be for the three hundred million Americans to kill every one of the billion Muslims in the world. A three to one disadvantage, but remember who is carrying the big stick.
I have the type of brain that has to see the whole before I make a judgment. When I hear a song or poem I never understand a word or a note the first time around, only the second time do I begin to grasp and enjoy it. Sometimes it takes more than that to sink in. But Righty in almost every case guessed the word being defined when Normando had got only two or three words into reading it. Righty clearly had played vortaro many times before. Once, only once did I guess the word, one of only a few times that they managed to get through an entire definition with nobody guessing. My word was something about a Japanese stove used for cooking or heating a room. I guessed "hibacxo." I had not realized that a hibachi was used for heating too. Righty's prowess was impressive, but he had suggested the game. Later I realized that I could have gotten a similar victory rush if I had challenged everybody to a game of chess. I could have blown all comers off the board just like Righty had with his Vortaro. But what would that prove?
On the long, boring trip home I thought a great deal about Righty and our little verbal skirmish. I have to say that I came to see George Bush in a new light. In a land where people think so belligerently and ahistorically, Bush truly is a moderate. He is the closest thing you get to an enlightened leader. Lesser leaders, leaders closer to the pulse of public opinion, might have made subsequent events into a huge bloodbath rather than the slow bloodletting that it turned out to be.
But the real question is, how do such stale, borrowed opinions proliferate? Then I thought of that broad-leaved, stunted, forest floor dwelling tree. Trees dwelling in direct sunlight need only small leaves. In fact, I had asked Normando this, what happens if that broad leafed maple-relative is exposed to direct sunlight? The leaves burn up, I was told. That is what has happened to both Americans and Muslims, they have become so isolated, so insular in their separate worlds that very little light gets through to them.
Minds in a non-diverse ecosystem respond by entering into fervent competition for a small amount of truth, a filtered, weak smidgeon that must suffice to keep them alive. It is a life and death struggle for them to become sensitive to dark, dank lighting conditions; their only survival measure is to grow very big opinions, as broad and universal as possible, opinions that cover everything. Make your point of view, your politics, your circumstantial beliefs into something that keeps you alive. They are your whole life, your religion; so, inflate yourself, make it so that you win every argument, every game. Scott Adams called one of his books, "Since when did ignorance become a point of view?" I would add, "Since when did arrogance become a lifestyle?" But that is just what happens. When supercharged, oversized opinions burn up we get what is called war. Violence of some kind or other is the only possible result.
I took about 600 megs of photos on this trip but did I take a picture of that ridiculous knee-high maple with its huge leaves? I do not think so. I will have to get a shot of one next time we plunge into a deep forest.
Anyway, look at what happened in
To give an example of the denial that thrives in insularity, a recent survey of Mullahs in
Indeed, what is humility, I ask you? It is the ability to sustain your ego without ego stroking; the ability to mold what is yours into what is in others too, like the rustling of an aspen tree.
The process of Baha'i consultation is such rustling leaves. It avoids solitude, competition, violence, strife and conflict by moving everybody out into the light. That is what it does intellectually, but spiritually? That is the essential part, the prayer and reflection that precede opening our mouth or even forming our opinions. That inner reformation allows a new, fresh leaf of opinion to spring out, not a dead, borrowed, pre-made point of view. The spiritual step conditions the tree of the heart, takes it out of the dark and adapts it to the light, puts us into a fuller state. Then we know that we can afford to carry tiny, un-obstructive opinions, compact, efficient viewpoints limited within the bounds of divine law, leaves that sustain elegantly. These little leaves do not burn up.
The Baha'i spirit is leaves of one tree, but not just any tree. It is a tree adapted to a bright, direct light, the tree of One God. If I had to pick a part of the Writings that illustrates this, it would be the Tarazat, or Ornaments, especially the opening section of Tarazat number two, which starts off:
"The second Taraz is to consort with the followers of all religions in a spirit of friendliness and fellowship, to proclaim that which the Speaker on Sinai hath set forth and to observe fairness in all matters. They that are endued with sincerity and faithfulness should associate with all the peoples and kindreds of the earth with joy and radiance, inasmuch as consorting with people hath promoted and will continue to promote unity and concord, which in turn are conducive to the maintenance of order in the world and to the regeneration of nations. Blessed are such as hold fast to the cord of kindliness and tender mercy and are free from animosity and hatred. This Wronged One exhorteth the peoples of the world to observe tolerance and righteousness, which are two lights amidst the darkness of the world and two educators for the edification of mankind. Happy are they who have attained thereto and woe betide the heedless." (Tablets, 35-36)
That word "ornament," so common in Baha'u'llah's Writing, has always puzzled me. Does not ornament mean something that can be disposed of, something not necessary? Yes, a big, small leafed tree can well dispense of many of its leaves, and in the present autumn season it dispenses with them all. That is why we all die, every man jack of us. But if we grow as tiny leaves on the Big Tree of Oneness we know we were created for this and we go with joy.
For me the highlight of the Kultura Vespero was a brilliant young
2 comments:
Ankaŭ mi havis la plezuron observi kelkajn senpetitajn "prelegojn" de la dekstremulo.
La interna logiko de liaj argumentoj ŝajnis pli-malpli kohera, sed samtempe, ŝajne ili baziĝis sur mirige trosimplaj, ŝovinistaj, kaj eĉ faŝistaj antaŭsupozoj.
Bedaŭrinde mankis al mi kaj lingvoscio kaj tempo por sufiĉe demandi al li pri tiuj, sed estus interese pli bone kompreni liajn kredojn. Ankaŭ estus interese apliki liajn proprajn argumentojn al tiuj okcidentaj virblankuloj, kun kiuj li ŝajne sin identigas. Mi supozas, ke la konkludoj ne plaĉus al li.
Ankaŭ estus interese lerni kial, precize, li opinias ke S-ro Chomsky estas perfidulo. Chomsky aparte ĝenas la faŝistojn pro liaj fortaj argumentoj, kiuj baziĝas sur saĝa esploro de historio. Prudenta pensulo ne povas facile forigi tiajn argumentojn, kaj sekve multaj dekstremuloj emas ataki lian karakteron anstataŭ liajn argumentojn.
Post a Comment