John Taylor
I am an essayist specializing in the Bahá'í Principles. Essays come out every day or so. Contact me at: badijet@gmail.com
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Article to commemorate the Martyrdom of the Bab
John Taylor
Monday, July 06, 2009
Comenius anticipated the Enlightenment, Only With God Intact
By John Taylor; 2009 July 06, Rahmat 12, 166 BE
My little project over the past year on the Badi' Blog has been to
examine John Amos Comenius's Universal Reform, or Panorthosia, in
detail. One of my central purposes in making this heavy commitment was
to demonstrate that every major feature of the so-called Enlightenment
project is not only discernable but also unmistakable in this book,
the first 10 Chapters of which were published in 1657, and the
remainder written over the last decade of the author's life, which
ended in 1670. This was thirty years before the Enlightenment is
supposed to have begun. What are enlightenment values? Here is a
succinct statement written last year by one of the stately atheists of
England, A.C. Grayling,
"When people talk about `Enlightenment values' now, they tend to mean
a modernized and somewhat idealized take on the 18th-century version.
Enlightenment values today are commitments to individual autonomy,
democracy, the rule of law, science, rationality, secularism,
pluralism, a humanistic ethics, the importance of education, the
promotion of human rights." (A.C. Grayling, "How Humans Dared To
Know," New Scientist, 26 July, 2008, p. 43)
It can be seen that, with the obvious exception of secularism, these
enlightenment ideals are all laid out by Comenius in a purely
religious context, each carefully documented as a legitimate offspring
of Biblical teaching. Even the idea of "enlightenment" is there -- in
fact this is the title, Via Lucis, or Way of Light, of another in
Comenius's series known as the Consultatio. It is true that most
Christians of his and subsequent times chose to reject the gentle,
principled tolerance of Comenius in favour of exclusivist dogma and
fundamentalism. Indeed it was not until Abdu'l-Baha laid out the
Baha'i principles a century ago that we see this path of peace and
enlightenment blazed once more in religious thought.
The exception we mentioned was secularism, the complete rejection and
expulsion of religion from the public thing. Comenius proposed instead
the image of politics as the head and body of a bird, and religion and
natural philosophy as the two wings that keep it in flight. Humanity
cannot fly without all three of these essential organs. What we now
call "humanism" has been appropriated by anti-theists, who imagine
that the bird can get out of the dust with a body and only one wing.
Rather, Comenius proposed, God is the highest ideal of true humanism,
since the entire bird was created in His image. This, Comenius
proposed, is a neutral enough ideal for both scientists and
politicians to invoke without taint of parochial bias.
"The method of organising the Political Community can best be derived
from the Idea of the Image of God, as follows: 1. Men should behave in
the same way towards the image of God (which means himself and his
fellow-men) as he should behave towards God. 2. Since mankind is God's
image, we should show the same behaviour towards it as God does, for
God is setting us an example." (Panorthosia, Ch. 12, para 8, pp. 190)
Unlike many religious, Comenius held that what we cannot learn from
scripture, the book of God, we can and should derive from God's other
book, the book of nature, that is, natural philosophy, what we now
call science.
"Then again ideas of a true political system can be derived from the
natural world, (e.g. the economist learning wisdom from the ant and
the politician from bees), and also from the artificial world. And far
from passing this over, as if the resemblances were purely accidental,
we should take it seriously, as reflecting God's everlasting wisdom
designed for our present purpose. For these creatures certainly take
their activities seriously, and the works which they produce are just
as real as ours ought to be. Thus any living, organic, and systematic
body is purely and simply God's representation of the idea of harmony
to which any political body must conform." (Panorthosia, Ch. 12, para
8, pp. 190)
This use of nature as educator about harmony and model for society
ties in to my other major writing project, proposing a new,
zero-environmental footprint construction along with the social
reforms that would enable it to be built.
John Taylor
email: badijet@gmail.com
blog: http://badiblog.blogspot.com/
::
Baha'i Rights Day, and Olya's Story in Comics
Tonight we read Olya's story of her imprisonment and torture for Baha'u'llah, as told in a back issue of Brilliant Star Magazine. Silvie was inspired, as often happens, to retell aspects of the story that strike her as amusing in comics.

Olya dreams of what is about to happen. Abdu'l-Baha figures in the dream. She is arrested by revolutionary guards in front of her three year old son. He holds onto the car door, screaming to have his mummy back. He is a strong kid and it takes two big guards to drag him off the handle. A bit of gallows humor in the midst of tragedy.

A fourteen year old's idea of tough conditions in the prison in Shiraz. Olya is served three spears of broccoli. Baha'i history is full of martyrdoms, and we read some every day. Silvie once confided in me: "I like to draw my childish pictures so that I will not feel too sad when I hear of what happened."

Yes, there was torture. The Master had warned Olya of this in her dream, and in telling the story to kids she is upbeat and emphasizes what she learned from it.

A child in the Brilliant Star interview asks if Olya had any photos of her childhood. "No, they were all confiscated by the Revolutionary Guards. Silvie imagines the guards following Olya around during her entire childhood, grabbing every snapshot as it is taken. Unfortunately, such intrusiveness is not too far off the mark.

::
Saturday, July 04, 2009
Comenius as Economist
By John Taylor; 2009 July 04, Rahmat 10, 166 BE
So far in this series of essays on the Badi' Blog we have looked at how Comenius's Universal Reform treats each of the first several Baha'i principles, search for truth, oneness of humanity, harmony of science and religion, and elimination of prejudice. The next Baha'i principle to tick off our list is economic equity. Comenius was by no means an economist. The bulk of his work is on reform, religion and education. However, as we shall see he did recognize the necessity for the reformer to better the lot of the poor. Iniquity in economic relations, he points out, is not only a waste of human potential but it also amounts to a kind of latent violence.
"The third evil derived from ignorant handling of things is that in the midst of the great abundance which God most generously promised to all who should inhabit his own dwelling-place of the world, most of mankind are either toiling in poverty or encountering trouble instead
of pleasure, disease instead of good health, and early death instead of long life. If this violence, active or passive, is not stopped, it will be impossible for our affairs to be fully reformed." (Panorthosia II, Ch. 9, para 9, p. 146)
Following certain Biblical passages, Comenius adds that the elimination of extreme poverty is tied to the lack of peace among nations. The elimination of war would also result in removal of warlike habits of speech, such as backbiting, gossip, swearing and execration.
"All the means should be available and anything else that could contribute towards peace and tranquillity, establishing all things in such perfect peace that not even a Dog moves his tongue against anyone (as it is told in the Epistle of Jude, 2 and 15) and fulfilling the
saying about the abundance of peace in the kingdom of Christ." (Ch. 12, para 7, pp. 188-189)
Works of charity and maintaining moral uprightness are special tasks of the religious wing of the world government (the other two are science and politics). Comenius envisioned in Panorthosia a world-embracing interfaith body whose franchises are called "consistories." Consistories should be established on every level of society, from world, continental to the neighborhood levels. As we have seen, he even imagined a room set aside in each family household for a small church. The consistories would have as their mandate looking over and providing for the poor.
"Also since the poor are the treasure of the Church, deposited with us by Christ, the Consistories will see that they are rightly cared for everywhere, by keeping a watchful eye on the provision and orderly maintenance of poorhouses, the chastity of lodging-houses, and general respectability among the common people." (Panorthosia, Ch. 18, para 14, p. 243)
Like Abdu'l-Baha, Comenius saw the futuristic potential of the storehouse invented in the Biblical story of Joseph and his interpretation of Pharaoh's dream. Instituting such a storehouse at every level of government would eliminate famine, penury and tend to
even out the worst economic imbalances among rich and poor.
"There should be one common food-supply for one family within one household, and a public supply in the same village or town should be drawn upon in such a way as to ensure fair distribution, meaning that there should not be some who have enough to make them sick while others are going hungry." (Ch. 24, para 1, p. 118-119)
This aims even closer to home than the "hundred-mile diet" advocated by the recent local food and slow food movements. Comenius would have the control of food production in public hands, not in that of anonymous private corporations, as now.
The advantage of centering food storage and distribution on the town and village level is that it encourages urban agriculture, while the focus on the household storehouse would make small kitchen gardens a source of fresh leafy greens and other vegetables. Comenius also suggests here that the family household is the best place to assure not only that the poor eat sufficiently, but also that there would be no more tolerance of overeating than there is of under-eating. Under such a food distribution system it is unlikely that obesity would be ubiquitous as it is now in rich lands, and even in poor ones.
Studies have found that in maintaining health how and when we eat our meals is almost as important as what or how much we consume. For example cultures like France where mealtimes are also social occasions tend to have less obesity, perhaps because the focus is more on conversation and less on stuffing one's face.
Comenius seems to have been aware of this when he suggested strong control of diet by the family household.
"A convenient way of arranging this is 1. by some agreed definition of meal-times; everyone should have lunch and supper at exactly the same hours, barring accidents. 2. by seeing that no one has more than three
or four courses served, and 3. by assisting necessitous cases. There should be public prefects who visit nearly every house once a week to see whether everyone is doing a proper day's work, and what kind of living they earn for it. Otherwise (in the event of sickness or for
some other reason) provision should be made from the public supply, so that no one is altogether neglected, or else steps should be taken quickly to have food sent to him by a neighbour." (Panorthosia, Ch. 24, para 1, p. 118-119)
This prefect system Comenius took from the Roman model, but something very similar is still being used in parts of China today. I have been advocating this system of invigilators, which I call "neighborhood
helpers," for many years. Because it deals in face-to-face contact rather than impersonal statistics it would allow for quicker response to economic dislocation, such as job losses and economic emergencies.
If police and doctors worked with prefects or neighborhood helpers, and all worked on a capitation basis, it would be possible to all but eliminate not only poverty but disease and crime as well.
Next time we will look at Comenius's other ideas for reforming trades and professions.
John Taylor
email: badijet@gmail.com
blog: http://badiblog.blogspot.com/
::
Friday, July 03, 2009
EP and the GAM, Part II
By John Taylor; 2009 July 03, Rahmat 09, 166 BE
We are considering the Great Announcement to Mankind, the section of
the Proclamation where Baha'u'llah addresses the entire human race as
a body. It is telling that here, not in earlier Tablets addressed to
leaders, He establishes the principle of elimination of prejudice.
Perhaps this is because other Baha'i social principles, such as
universal peace and economic readjustment, begin in strong initiatives
from the center, by public officials and experts. Prejudice, though,
is so universal a condition that there is a severe limit to what
anybody, as opposed to everybody, can do to stop it. Baha'u'llah sees
leaders taking a back seat, restricting themselves to what later came
to be called consciousness raising.
"Please God, the peoples of the world may be led, as the result of the
high endeavours exerted by their rulers and the wise and learned
amongst men, to recognize their best interests." (Proclamation, 113)
Strong, extrinsic measures tend only to suppress other fundamental
human rights, such as equality or freedom of expression. The Great
Announcement to Mankind (GAM) takes a different, intrinsic approach by
calling upon the people as a whole to take the lion's share of the
responsibility for expunging prejudice upon themselves.
"O contending peoples and kindreds of the earth! Set your faces
towards unity, and let the radiance of its light shine upon you.
Gather ye together, and for the sake of God resolve to root out
whatever is the source of contention amongst you. Then will the
effulgence of the world's great Luminary envelop the whole earth, and
its inhabitants become the citizens of one city, and the occupants of
one and the same throne." (Proclamation, 114)
This is as specific as you can get with prejudice as a social problem,
simply make a resolution "to root out whatever is the source of
contention amongst you." This is wise, since as long as prejudice
prevails just about anything, no matter how niggling, becomes a bone
of contention. It is best to be aware of this and seek out the fire
producing all this smoke, prejudice.
Like a petulant child who cries at the slightest annoyance, the causes
of human strife have many outward expressions but usually can be
traced to one of only a few underlying problems. No matter what the
shouting seems to be about a toddler is usually either wet, tired,
sick or hungry. In the case of severe social contention, the "source
of contention" is an injustice invariably caused by some breed of
prejudice, be it racial, sexual, national, ethnic or one of any number
of other varieties. In order to stop the "contending peoples and
kindreds" from continuing in the same old faulty caterwauling,
Baha'u'llah offers a series of questions.
"How long will humanity persist in its waywardness? How long will
injustice continue? How long is chaos and confusion to reign amongst
men? How long will discord agitate the face of society?" (113)
The way ahead leads only to further misery. New, more stable
presuppositions are needed if the people are to stop the hatred from
feeding upon itself and spreading out of control, leading to the
ultimate impasse to reform, apathy and loss of hope.
"The winds of despair are, alas, blowing from every direction, and the
strife that divideth and afflicteth the human race is daily
increasing. The signs of impending convulsions and chaos can now be
discerned, inasmuch as the prevailing order appeareth to be lamentably
defective." (113)
Baha'u'llah later in the GAM points to the root cause of prejudice,
the first deadly sin, pride. Experts and ideologues have arrogated to
themselves the divine responsibility of the salvation of humanity, and
though they clearly have botched the job, they continue bungling,
anything but admit that they are helpless to stop the spread of the
disease.
"We can well perceive how the whole human race is encompassed with
great, with incalculable afflictions. We see it languishing on its bed
of sickness, sore-tried and disillusioned. They that are intoxicated
by self-conceit have interposed themselves between it and the Divine
and infallible Physician. Witness how they have entangled all men,
themselves included, in the mesh of their devices. They can neither
discover the cause of the disease, nor have they any knowledge of the
remedy. They have conceived the straight to be crooked, and have
imagined their friend an enemy." (116-117)
Baha'u'llah was a good Platonist in that He believed that virtue can
be taught, but here in addressing humanity as a body He also makes it
clear that ignorance and pride can spread even more quickly than
knowledge. Like a virus, which spreads unimpeded by normal biological
processes, prejudice is a kind of ignorance that bypasses the usual
requirement that a truth be rooted in reality.
In its essence, then, prejudice is a viral attack on heart and mind.
It resembles the HIV/AIDS virus in that it can attack from any
direction and transmute itself into a myriad forms, turning immune
defences on their ear. There are innumerable types of biases and their
expressions tend to be subtle, inchoate and shifting. Prejudice is
also like common cold viruses. The fact that we give one name to
similar set of symptoms does not mean that it comes from one source.
Colds are now known to arise from any of hundreds of different
viruses, each with different structure and characteristics.
In the same way we can come up with a thousand excuses to quit
investigating before the whole truth is fully grasped. The result of
every such abdication is a pre-judgement that, as it spreads, becomes
a prejudice. This is why prejudice is untouchable by the blunt
instrument of the law. Government legislation can inflict legal
sanctions to curtail blatant bigotry, but this only alleviates
symptoms in the latter stages of the disease. Outward measures do
nothing to halt the penetration of prejudice into hearts and minds.
Baha'u'llah then goes on to address perhaps the most prolific,
persistent and widespread variety of prejudice, that which grows
within and among religions. This has made the Middle East a more
severe and enduring cauldron of violence than anywhere else in the
world. Baha'u'llah begins by assuring all sides that an adequate
measure of truth is on their side,
"There can be no doubt whatever that the peoples of the world, of
whatever race or religion, derive their inspiration from one heavenly
Source, and are the subjects of one God. The difference between the
ordinances under which they abide should be attributed to the varying
requirements and exigencies of the age in which they were revealed.
All of them, except a few which are the outcome of human perversity,
were ordained of God, and are a reflection of His Will and Purpose."
(Proclamation, 114)
The very fact that so many people have found the truth of a major
religious tradition useful over many centuries is proof that each has
a sufficient measure of truth. There is no need to put others down in
order to legitimate our own heritage. Since iconoclastic leanings are
central to every monotheist faith, each believer has a central duty to
break apart the real idols of this age, the 'isms and ideologies that
take the place of independent thought. This is the critical initiative
is what God is calling every one of us to take.
"Arise and, armed with the power of faith, shatter to pieces the gods
of your vain imaginings, the sowers of dissension amongst you. Cleave
unto that which draweth you together and uniteth you. This, verily, is
the most exalted Word which the Mother Book hath sent down and
revealed unto you. To this beareth witness the Tongue of Grandeur from
His habitation of glory." (Proclamation, 114)
While the relations between religion have shown themselves a prolific
breeding ground for this virus, Baha'u'llah also holds up hope that if
the world's religions take the initiative they can stand together for
the truth and the life that prejudice inherently denies. They can do
this by eliminating the negative, by purifying themselves of moral
turpitude,
"Beware lest the desires of the flesh and of a corrupt inclination
provoke divisions among you. Be ye as the fingers of one hand, the
members of one body. Thus counselleth you the Pen of Revelation, if ye
be of them that believe." (118)
And they can explode the virus by upholding the positive, by
testifying to the God of love, the bond of unity that takes hold on
whoever enter into the fundamentals of faith,
"This is the Day in which God's most excellent favours have been
poured out upon men, the Day in which His most mighty grace hath been
infused into all created things. It is incumbent upon all the peoples
of the world to reconcile their differences, and, with perfect unity
and peace, abide beneath the shadow of the Tree of His care and
loving-kindness." (Proclamation, 121)
John Taylor
email: badijet@gmail.com
blog: http://badiblog.blogspot.com/
::
Thursday, July 02, 2009
Long Live the Philosopher King!
::
Wednesday, July 01, 2009
Getting Experts and the People to Embrace
By John Taylor; 2009 July 01, Rahmat 07, 166 BE
Precis: If we are ever to start addressing the challenge of global
warming, specialists will have to renounce their monastic seclusion
and enter into social action. This can be done by formalizing and
opening up the mechanisms of planning.
One thing that Mike Holmes, star of the television series "Holmes on
Homes," often says on his show sums up what I have been aiming at in
the Badi' essays written over the past week. He says that most
homeowners know what they want but that it is the sacred duty of
contractors and other expert tradespersons before they touch a
contract or pick up a hammer to educate homeowners about what they
need. Otherwise, disaster threatens; roofs collapse, floods occur and
houses burn down. As the song says, you do not always get what you
want but sometimes you get what you need. That sounds like a plan.
Literally. A plan is feedback between what we want and what we need, a
process that continues before and during every action. On a broader
level, Holmes is responding in a practical way to the ancient, sacred
duty of the intellectual to tell truth to power.
The learned of all types must involve themselves in social planning,
since we all have to be certain of what we need before we can possibly
plan what we want. This is especially so now, when so little truth is
spoken to power, and less is heard. It is axiomatic that a community
of world citizens would be both what we need and what we want. It
would look far more beautiful than ours, torn as it is by conflicting
loyalties.
A big reason that the environment has deteriorated this badly is that
ever since the rise of Marxism and Fascism, experts in the West have
roundly rejected comprehensive thinking, and planning most of all.
Now, the looming threat of global climate destabilization is acting as
a giant alarm bell, booming at Ivory Towers everywhere to empty out.
Experts must stop learning more and more about less and less and start
working out what we all need to know in order to plan together. Only
by uniting the people with the experts and together planning our
collective rescue can we hope to reverse climate change.
As theorists from Aristotle to `Abdu'l-Baha tell us, every conscious
plan requires three things, knowledge, volition and action. To build a
house or addition to a house you need an architect or other qualified
designer to devise a plan that takes into account current standards
and building codes (knowledge). Then, you need the power to act,
meaning the money to pay workers and buy materials (volition).
Finally, you need coordinated, punctual application of the plan by
skilled workers (action).
The first requirement of every building plan, as Mike Holmes often
points out, is that it adhere to code. Building codes protect
occupants by assuring that the new construction will not burn down or
collapse on their heads. We are threatened by global warming simply
because our building codes and other standards fall far short of what
the need is for safety on a planetary scale. We are unwilling to
respond to this increasingly glaring need because we are not world
citizens as yet. This broadening out to cosmopolitianism we need more
than anything to plan.
According to the Wikipedia article on Cosmopolitanism, the basis of a
cosmopolitan order is "nested structures of governance" that balance
two principles, irreducibility and subsidiarity. Irreducibility is the
principle that certain problems can only be addressed at the global
level. Examples are, as mentioned, global warming, as well as war and
strife among nations. The other principle of cosmopolitanism is
subsidiarity. This is the principle that decisions should be made at
as local a level as possible, since here is where the experts live.
Where there is face-to-face contact an impulse and feedback are
established between knowledge and experience.
Abdu'l-Baha spoke of such "nested structures" when He talked about
"circles of unity" or "circles of love." Each level or aspect of
society, from individual, family, skin colour, nation, color,
language, to the broadest, the human race under God, is a circle of
unity rippling out like waves from where a tossed stone enters a calm
pond. Each ripple is a wave enclosing all others, but it in turn is
enclosed by a wider wave.
According to `Abdu'l-Baha's brainchild, the Baha'i principles, the
closest wave to the center is the source of the original impulse, the
individual. As we investigate we are ever renewing our search for
truth, making the smallest but most energetic wave. The widest wave is
the goal and product of the efforts of us all, world peace. Search for
truth gives the world the cosmopolitan principle of subsidiarity,
since the self is the ultimate locality. Each of us on our own is best
qualified to work out our place in the universe and thereby advance
our own career, worship, education and service to humanity.
The principle of universal peace is the expression of irreducibility.
No matter how well we do as individuals and groups, it can all be
wiped out in a moment at the touch of the nuclear button, or more
slowly by the deterioration of the natural environment and the
destabilization of climate through global warming.
We need a truly open and democratic planning system. We need full
involvement by the learned in making standards, codes and plans that
apply subsidiarity and irreducability. That, combined with common
consent, wealth and practical action, would be our only hope to
respond quickly to the inexorable advance of global warming.
John Taylor
email: badijet@gmail.com
blog: http://badiblog.blogspot.com/
::